Asus P8H67

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 13%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 67%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 11%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (62nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 38 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 59.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics14.5% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive37% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus P8H67  (all builds)
Memory6.1 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130912
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 31 '22 at 16:46
Run Duration170 Seconds
Run User LKA-User
Background CPU3%

 PC Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-3220-$60
LGA1155, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
59.2% Above average
Memory 78.2
1-Core 90.9
2-Core 162
65% 111 Pts
4-Core 234
8-Core 234
31% 234 Pts
64-Core 234
14% 234 Pts
Poor: 38%
This bench: 59.2%
Great: 62%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 560-$180
Elitegroup(1019 2038) 1GB
CLim: 810 MHz, MLim: 1002 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 391.35
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
14.5% Very poor
Lighting 16.8
Reflection 24
Parallax 15.9
14% 18.9 fps
MRender 25.7
Gravity 18.3
Splatting 16.7
16% 20.2 fps
Poor: 12%
This bench: 14.5%
Great: 15%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SSD 64GB
19GB free (System drive)
Firmware: S9FM02.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 38 61 27 41 42 31 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
37% Below average
Read 372
Write 53.8
Mixed 110
SusWrite 39.9
31% 144 MB/s
4K Read 23.9
4K Write 43.8
4K Mixed 4.6
65% 24.1 MB/s
DQ Read 24.1
DQ Write 50.2
DQ Mixed 9.9
15% 28.1 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 37%
Great: 73%
Samsung HD161GJ 160GB-$25
78GB free
Firmware: 1AC01118
SusWrite @10s intervals: 75 75 75 76 76 76 MB/s
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
47.7% Average
Read 90.5
Write 39.7
Mixed 57.3
SusWrite 75.5
49% 65.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 1
177% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 47.7%
Great: 62%
Samsung HD160JJ 152GB
57GB free
Firmware: WU100-32
SusWrite @10s intervals: 48 47 47 47 47 47 MB/s
Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
27.8% Poor
Read 49.3
Write 52.5
Mixed 38.5
SusWrite 47.2
35% 46.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.8
142% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 27.8%
Great: 34%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CMA5-4FA03AALA1U00 Hynix HMT351U6CFR8C-H9 8GB
1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
49.8% Average
MC Read 17.8
MC Write 17.7
MC Mixed 16
49% 17.2 GB/s
SC Read 15.1
SC Write 16.7
SC Mixed 15.7
45% 15.8 GB/s
Latency 84
48% 84 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical P8H67 Builds (Compare 989 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 24%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 20%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Asus P8H67 - $140

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 76% - Very good Total price: $448
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback