MAB WMBBOOKv1

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 1%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 15%
Surfboard
Workstation
Workstation 1%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (58th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 42 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 26.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics1.9% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive35.1% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory2GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows however a minimum of 4GB is recommended for gaming or any other RAM intensive tasks such as photo/video editing. This system will also be a little more responsive with 4GB of RAM.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (32%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemMAB WMBBOOKv1  (all builds)
MotherboardTo ITo be filled by O.E.M.
Memory1.6 GB free of 2 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20201217
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 31 '22 at 15:11
Run Duration156 Seconds
Run User ARG-User
Background CPU 32%

 PC Performing as expected (58th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Celeron J3355E
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 2 GHz, turbo 2.4 GHz (avg)
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
26.9% Poor
Memory 39.4
1-Core 42.6
2-Core 86.5
33% 56.2 Pts
4-Core 85
8-Core 83.6
11% 84.3 Pts
64-Core 83.2
5% 83.2 Pts
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD Graphics 500
Intel(8086 2212) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 30.0.101.1340
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
1.9% Terrible
Lighting 2.1
Reflection 1.7
Parallax 1.6
2% 1.8 fps
MRender 3.6
Gravity 1.9
Splatting 2.8
2% 2.77 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.9%
Great: 2%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Txrui M450 64GB
32GB free (System drive)
Firmware: S1022A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 179 144 173 60 49 42 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
35.1% Below average
Read 188
Write 183
Mixed 193
SusWrite 108
38% 168 MB/s
4K Read 13.9
4K Write 47.5
4K Mixed 7.5
56% 23 MB/s
DQ Read 104
DQ Write 122
DQ Mixed 34.5
48% 86.9 MB/s
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
ABCD 123456789012345678 2x1GB
2 of 2 slots used
2GB DIMM LPDDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing as expected (41st percentile)
17.4% Very poor
MC Read 5.6
MC Write 7.4
MC Mixed 5.8
18% 6.27 GB/s
SC Read 3.3
SC Write 4.6
SC Mixed 3.5
11% 3.8 GB/s
Latency 205
20% 205 ns
Poor: 11%
This bench: 17.4%
Great: 30%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical WMBBOOKv1 Builds (Compare 2 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 30%
Sail boat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: MAB WMBBOOKv1

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060 $291WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $145
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback