MSI PRO Z690-P DDR4 (MS-7D36)

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 125%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 100%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 130%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (41st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 59 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 106%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics120% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
CPU throttled at 91% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago.
SystemMicro-Star MS-7D36
MotherboardMSI PRO Z690-P DDR4 (MS-7D36)  (all builds)
Memory25.1 GB free of 32 GB @ 3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, , 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20211223
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 31 '22 at 13:32
Run Duration377 Seconds
Run User IND-User
Background CPU6%
CPU Throttled 91%
Watch Gameplay: 3060-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (41st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-12600K-$170
U3E1, 1 CPU, 10 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.35 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)
106% Outstanding
Memory 88.4
1-Core 171
2-Core 342
107% 201 Pts
4-Core 657
8-Core 1,113
108% 885 Pts
64-Core 1,888
117% 1,888 Pts
Poor: 100%
This bench: 106%
Great: 117%
Graphics Cards Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3060-Ti-$340
Gigabyte(1458 4060) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3600 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 512.96
Performing below potential (12th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
120% Outstanding
Lighting 156
Reflection 206
Parallax 134
127% 165 fps
MRender 194
Gravity 140
Splatting 121
120% 152 fps
Poor: 116%
This bench: 120%
Great: 136%
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
CLim: 2012 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 512.96
Performing below potential (35th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
28.3% Poor
Lighting 34.9
Reflection 46.1
Parallax 31.4
28% 37.5 fps
MRender 37.8
Gravity 38.8
Splatting 28.1
28% 34.9 fps
Poor: 27%
This bench: 28.3%
Great: 33%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SanDisk SSD Plus 240GB-$30
11GB free (System drive)
Firmware: Z33130RL
SusWrite @10s intervals: 115 46 37 89 38 21 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
Write 139
Mixed 15.2
SusWrite 57.7
16% 70.7 MB/s
4K Read 13
4K Write 105
4K Mixed 23.6
106% 47.3 MB/s
DQ Read 228
DQ Write 240
DQ Mixed 0.2
65% 156 MB/s
Poor: 35% Great: 86%
WDS100T1X0E-00AFY0 1TB
168GB free
Firmware: 614900WD
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 4,142
Write 4,131
Mixed 3,286
860% 3,853 MB/s
4K Read 88.4
4K Write 328
4K Mixed 119
460% 179 MB/s
DQ Read 2,292
DQ Write 1,836
DQ Mixed 2,082
1,554% 2,070 MB/s
Poor: 264% Great: 573%
Samsung PSSD T7 2TB
156GB free
Firmware: 0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 482 141 214 688 550 691 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 49% Great: 100%
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016)-$62
110GB free
Firmware: CC26
SusWrite @10s intervals: 152 167 171 172 160 173 MB/s
Performing below expectations (24th percentile)
78.9% Very good
Read 109
Write 123
Mixed 83.5
SusWrite 166
88% 120 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.5
111% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 63%
This bench: 78.9%
Great: 114%
External USB3.0 500GB
48GB free
Firmware: 0204
SusWrite @10s intervals: 50 48 55 57 49 58 MB/s
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
33.9% Below average
Read 65.2
Write 66.3
Mixed 30
SusWrite 52.8
39% 53.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.5
104% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 33.9%
Great: 63%
WD My Passport 2627 4TB
1GB free, PID 2627
Operating at USB 3.1 Speed
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 83.2
Write 76.8
Mixed 50.5
87% 70.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 3
4K Mixed 0.7
129% 1.53 MB/s
Poor: 19% Great: 64%
Sony Storage Media 64GB
58GB free, PID 09c4
Operating at USB 3.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 97 41 41 43 38 43 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
30.4% Below average
Read 115
Write 103
Mixed 65.8
SusWrite 50.6
107% 83.8 MB/s
4K Read 4.6
4K Write 0.5
4K Mixed 1.4
82% 2.17 MB/s
Poor: 6%
This bench: 30.4%
Great: 28%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G Skill Intl F4-3200C16-16GVK Corsair CMR16GX4M2C3000C16 Corsair CMR16GX4M2C3000C16 32GB
3000, 3000, 3000 MHz
16384, 8192, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
99.9% Outstanding
MC Read 35.9
MC Write 36.8
MC Mixed 34.3
102% 35.7 GB/s
SC Read 25.4
SC Write 40.1
SC Mixed 30.2
91% 31.9 GB/s
Latency 69.1
58% 69.1 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical PRO Z690-P DDR4 (MS-7D36) Builds (Compare 3,597 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 198%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 110%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 202%
UFO

Motherboard: MSI PRO Z690-P DDR4 (MS-7D36)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 73% - Very good Total price: $1,207
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback