Biostar A68MDE

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 62%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (76th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 24 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 61.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics8.41% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Run History
MotherboardBiostar A68MDE  (all builds)
Memory5.7 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20171127
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 31 '22 at 12:25
Run Duration128 Seconds
Run User PHL-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing above expectations (76th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Athlon II X4 760K (2013 D.Ri)-$59
P0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 4.3 GHz
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
61.8% Good
Memory 87.2
1-Core 73.8
2-Core 140
62% 100 Pts
4-Core 213
8-Core 218
29% 215 Pts
64-Core 220
14% 220 Pts
Poor: 39%
This bench: 61.8%
Great: 61%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 730
Nvidia(10DE 1287) 2GB
CLim: 1118 MHz, MLim: 1385 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 473.62
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
8.41% Terrible
Lighting 10.3
Reflection 14.3
Parallax 11.5
8% 12 fps
MRender 12.5
Gravity 9.1
Splatting 9.7
8% 10.4 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 8.41%
Great: 7%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SSD HEORIADY HX-001 120G 120GB
34GB free
Firmware: S0424A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 309 158 82 22 51 35 MB/s
Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)
48.4% Average
Read 347
Write 287
Mixed 254
SusWrite 109
56% 249 MB/s
4K Read 21.7
4K Write 71.2
4K Mixed 12.7
87% 35.2 MB/s
DQ Read 24
DQ Write 96.5
DQ Mixed 15.8
25% 45.4 MB/s
Poor: 32%
This bench: 48.4%
Great: 63%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 500GB-$23
150GB free (System drive)
Firmware: KC45
SusWrite @10s intervals: 52 100 60 102 104 107 MB/s
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
57% Above average
Read 112
Write 113
Mixed 47
SusWrite 87.3
65% 89.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1
4K Mixed 0.8
137% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 57%
Great: 88%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 4G1600CL11 8GB
1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
35.5% Below average
MC Read 16.4
MC Write 6.9
MC Mixed 12.4
34% 11.9 GB/s
SC Read 9.1
SC Write 7.5
SC Mixed 11.4
27% 9.33 GB/s
Latency 70.3
57% 70.3 ns
Poor: 21%
This bench: 35.5%
Great: 47%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical A68MDE Builds (Compare 26 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 52%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Biostar A68MDE

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 72% - Very good Total price: $50
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year so they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $156Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $361Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback