Compaq PRESARIOCQ18

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 1%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 42%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (66th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 34 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 46.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics1.44% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago.
SystemCompaq PRESARIOCQ18  (all builds)
MotherboardCOMPAQ PRESARIOCQ18
Memory2.7 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1024 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20130905
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateMay 30 '22 at 23:22
Run Duration113 Seconds
Run User COL-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing above expectations (66th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Celeron 1037U
CPU Socket - U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 1.8 GHz
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
46.7% Average
Memory 77.5
1-Core 39.5
2-Core 95.3
46% 70.8 Pts
4-Core 95.6
8-Core 95.9
13% 95.8 Pts
64-Core 94.7
6% 94.7 Pts
Poor: 28%
This bench: 46.7%
Great: 52%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD Graphics (G3 Pentium/Celeron 1.0/1.1 GHz)
Intel(8086 2111) 1.8GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.10.5161
Performing below expectations (24th percentile)
1.44% Terrible
Lighting 1.7
Reflection 1.1
Parallax 1.4
1% 1.4 fps
MRender 2.8
Gravity 1
Splatting 1.9
2% 1.9 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.44%
Great: 2%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate ST320LM0 01 HN-M320MBB 320GB
8GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2AR2
SusWrite @10s intervals: 65 71 69 68 72 73 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
41.6% Average
Read 74.9
Write 80.1
Mixed 46.3
SusWrite 69.6
50% 67.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.9
158% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 41.6%
Great: 47%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 1x4GB
1 of 4 slots used
4GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
30.8% Below average
MC Read 10.9
MC Write 10.7
MC Mixed 9.7
30% 10.4 GB/s
SC Read 8.5
SC Write 7.7
SC Mixed 7.7
23% 7.97 GB/s
Latency 85.4
47% 85.4 ns
Poor: 13%
This bench: 30.8%
Great: 52%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical PRESARIOCQ18 Builds (Compare 6 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 42%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Compaq PRESARIOCQ18

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $289WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $145
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback