HP Compaq 8000 Elite SFF PC

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 44%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (46th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 54 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 47%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics3.56% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive63.6% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 16GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (23%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemHP Compaq 8000 Elite SFF PC  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 3646h
Memory13.4 GB free of 16.0039 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20091022
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 30 '22 at 19:41
Run Duration163 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU 23%

 PC Performing as expected (46th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core2 Quad Q9400-$170
XU1 PROCESSOR, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.65 GHz, turbo 2.5 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
47% Average
Memory 65.7
1-Core 42.1
2-Core 84.8
41% 64.2 Pts
4-Core 165
8-Core 168
22% 167 Pts
64-Core 167
10% 167 Pts
Poor: 34%
This bench: 47%
Great: 53%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 710
Asus(1043 8572) 2GB
CLim: 954 MHz, MLim: 450 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 456.71
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
3.56% Terrible
Lighting 4.3
Reflection 4.1
Parallax 4.5
4% 4.3 fps
MRender 4.3
Gravity 3.9
Splatting 5
4% 4.4 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.56%
Great: 4%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Adroitlark 120GB 120GB
82GB free (System drive)
Firmware: Q0720A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 211 171 147 144 147 147 MB/s
Performing below potential (6th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
63.6% Good
Read 255
Write 246
Mixed 236
SusWrite 161
50% 225 MB/s
4K Read 28
4K Write 46
4K Mixed 34.7
111% 36.2 MB/s
DQ Read 202
DQ Write 189
DQ Mixed 112
107% 168 MB/s
Poor: 68%
This bench: 63.6%
Great: 111%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 500GB-$23
466GB free
Firmware: HP74
SusWrite @10s intervals: 117 121 120 120 121 122 MB/s
Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
67.7% Good
Read 116
Write 101
Mixed 62.9
SusWrite 120
73% 100 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1
4K Mixed 0.8
137% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 67.7%
Great: 88%
SanDisk Ultra USB 3.0 32GB-$7
24GB free, PID 5581
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 16 17 17 16 17 18 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
13.1% Very poor
Read 32.3
Write 17.3
Mixed 21.5
SusWrite 16.7
28% 22 MB/s
4K Read 4.7
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 1.4
106% 2.43 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 13.1%
Great: 38%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown ID:85 9B CT51264BD160B.C16 ID:85 9B CT51264BD160B.C16 ID:85 9B CT51264BD160B.C16 ID:85 9B CT51264BD160B.C16 52GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 0 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096, 36864 MB
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
21.1% Poor
MC Read 7.6
MC Write 6.4
MC Mixed 6.4
19% 6.8 GB/s
SC Read 5.8
SC Write 6.6
SC Mixed 6.8
18% 6.4 GB/s
Latency 112
36% 112 ns
Poor: 17%
This bench: 21.1%
Great: 41%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Compaq 8000 Elite SFF PC Builds (Compare 507 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 40%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk

System: HP Compaq 8000 Elite SFF PC

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 45% - Average Total price: $115
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback