Compulab Airtop3

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (28th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 72 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 91.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Boot Drive291% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory128GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 128GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (87%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemCompulab Airtop3  (all builds)
MotherboardCompulab SBC-ATCFL
Memory116.7 GB free of 128 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200506
Uptime6.5 Days
Run DateMay 30 '22 at 09:09
Run Duration229 Seconds
Run User CHE-User
Background CPU 87%

 PC Performing below expectations (28th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E-2288G
U3E1, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.7 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
91.5% Outstanding
Memory 76.6
1-Core 143
2-Core 287
90% 169 Pts
4-Core 570
8-Core 938
92% 754 Pts
64-Core 1,487
92% 1,487 Pts
Poor: 86%
This bench: 91.5%
Great: 104%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$90
582GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1504 1447 1444 1444 1448 1409 MB/s
Performing below expectations (36th percentile)
291% Outstanding
Read 2,250
Write 2,233
Mixed 1,783
SusWrite 1,450
434% 1929 MB/s
4K Read 55.7
4K Write 111
4K Mixed 71.7
235% 79.5 MB/s
DQ Read 922
DQ Write 858
DQ Mixed 884
665% 888 MB/s
Poor: 188%
This bench: 291%
Great: 410%
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$90
805GB free
Firmware: 2B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2244 2186 1499 1517 1490 1527 MB/s
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
317% Outstanding
Read 2,300
Write 2212
Mixed 1,831
SusWrite 1,744
455% 2,022 MB/s
4K Read 56.5
4K Write 118
4K Mixed 74.1
243% 82.8 MB/s
DQ Read 976
DQ Write 938
DQ Mixed 934
708% 949 MB/s
Poor: 188%
This bench: 317%
Great: 410%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M391A4G43MB1-CTD 4x31.8GB
4 of 4 slots used
127GB DIMM DDR4 2667 MHz clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing below potential (4th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
67.8% Good
MC Read 22.4
MC Write 27.5
MC Mixed 21.5
68% 23.8 GB/s
SC Read 16.7
SC Write 29.2
SC Mixed 21.9
65% 22.6 GB/s
Latency 87.1
46% 87.1 ns
Poor: 73%
This bench: 67.8%
Great: 109%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Airtop3 Builds (Compare 12 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 95%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 97%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 86%
Aircraft carrier

System: Compulab Airtop3

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 103% - Outstanding Total price: $333
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate a lot of reddit accounts. UserBenchmark exposes their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data which saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback