Samsung 275E4E/275E5E

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 10%
Tree trunk
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (33rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 67 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 21.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics0.82% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory2GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows however a minimum of 4GB is recommended for gaming or any other RAM intensive tasks such as photo/video editing. This system will also be a little more responsive with 4GB of RAM.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 8 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen.
Sub-optimal background CPU (11%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
3 years ago, 2 years ago.
SystemSamsung 275E4E/275E5E  (all builds)
MotherboardSAMSUNG NP275E4V-K02MY
Memory0.2 GB free of 2 GB @ 0.8 GHz
OSWindows 8
BIOS Date20130805
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 30 '22 at 08:22
Run Duration232 Seconds
Run User MYS-User
Background CPU 11%

 PC Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD E1-1500 APU (2012 M.Za)
P0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 1.5 GHz, turbo 1.45 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (41st percentile)
21.7% Poor
Memory 37.9
1-Core 16.6
2-Core 34.2
20% 29.6 Pts
4-Core 34.2
8-Core 34.2
5% 34.2 Pts
64-Core 33.7
2% 33.7 Pts
Poor: 12%
This bench: 21.7%
Great: 35%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 7310
Sanyo(144D C680) 384MB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 8.97.10.6
Performing as expected (60th percentile)
0.82% Terrible
Lighting 1
Reflection 1.7
Parallax 1.5
1% 1.4 fps
MRender 1.4
Gravity 0.4
Splatting 1.2
1% 1 fps
Poor: 0%
This bench: 0.82%
Great: 1%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Toshiba MQ01ABD050 500GB-$23
378GB free (System drive)
Firmware: AX002F
SusWrite @10s intervals: 83 75 79 80 81 72 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
27.9% Poor
Read 19
Write 23.5
Mixed 3
SusWrite 78.4
22% 31 MB/s
4K Read 0.2
4K Write 0.4
4K Mixed 0.1
27% 0.23 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 27.9%
Great: 62%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471B5773EB0-CK0 1x2GB
1 of 2 slots used
2GB SODIMM DDR3 800 MHz clocked @ 533 MHz
Performing below potential (23rd percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
10.7% Very poor
MC Read 4.2
MC Write 3.4
MC Mixed 4.1
11% 3.9 GB/s
SC Read 0.4
SC Write 2.2
SC Mixed 0.4
3% 1 GB/s
Latency 212
19% 212 ns
Poor: 8%
This bench: 10.7%
Great: 31%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 275E4E/275E5E Builds (Compare 39 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 25%
Raft
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Samsung 275E4E/275E5E

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 10% - Terrible Total price: $89
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing charade so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit a lot from flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they've no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to market inferior products. UserBenchmark's data challenges the marketing and exposes the youtubers' biases.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. The 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we've dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data which saves our users millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback