Asus A8N-E

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (85th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 15 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 43.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics8.5% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Memory2GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows however a minimum of 4GB is recommended for gaming or any other RAM intensive tasks such as photo/video editing. This system will also be a little more responsive with 4GB of RAM.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Very high background CPU (38%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus A8N-E  (all builds)
Memory1.4 GB free of 2 GB @ 0.4 GHz
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20060407
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 30 '22 at 01:39
Run Duration138 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU 38%

 PC Performing way above expectations (85th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Athlon 64 3700+
Socket 939, 1 CPU, 1 cores, 1 threads
Base clock 2.2 GHz
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
43.8% Average
Memory 83
1-Core 31.9
2-Core 19.6
37% 44.8 Pts
4-Core 31.7
8-Core 31.7
4% 31.7 Pts
64-Core 31.7
2% 31.7 Pts
Poor: 14%
This bench: 43.8%
Great: 44%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD FirePro W5000 (FireGL V)
AMD(1002 0B06)
Driver: Ver. 8.982.8.3000
Relative performance (0th percentile)
8.5% Terrible
Lighting 15.8
Reflection 26.6
Parallax 21.4
13% 21.3 fps
Poor: 14%
This bench: 8.5%
Great: 16%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Spcc Solid State Disk 256GB
219GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFM61.5
SusWrite @10s intervals: 20 61 106 105 106 68 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 5% Great: 62%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 2x1GB
2 of 4 slots used
2GB DIMM
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
14.9% Very poor
MC Read 5
MC Write 3.5
MC Mixed 3.2
11% 3.9 GB/s
SC Read 5.9
SC Write 3.4
SC Mixed 4
13% 4.43 GB/s
Latency 75.1
53% 75.1 ns
Poor: 6%
This bench: 14.9%
Great: 20%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical A8N-E Builds (Compare 4 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 38%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus A8N-E

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 9% - Terrible Total price: $36
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $48
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback