Sony VPCF12S1E

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 55%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (67th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 33 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 58.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics2.53% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive36.2% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago.
SystemSony VPCF12S1E  (all builds)
MotherboardSony VAIO
Memory3 GB free of 6 GB
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit väriä
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20101011
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 29 '22 at 03:49
Run Duration153 Seconds
Run User FIN-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing above expectations (67th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7 Q 740-$190
N/A, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 1.75 GHz, turbo 1.85 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
58.3% Above average
Memory 84.5
1-Core 70.7
2-Core 117
58% 90.8 Pts
4-Core 183
8-Core 220
26% 201 Pts
64-Core 217
14% 217 Pts
Poor: 38%
This bench: 58.3%
Great: 62%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 330M
Sony(104D 9067) 1GB
Ram: 1GB, Driver: 342.01
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
2.53% Terrible
Lighting 3
Reflection 2.2
Parallax 1.3
2% 2.17 fps
MRender 4.6
Gravity 2.3
Splatting 3.1
3% 3.33 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 2.53%
Great: 3%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston SSDNow V300 240GB-$35
98GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 60AABBF0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 125 118 134 121 129 111 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
36.2% Below average
Read 182
Write 147
Mixed 182
SusWrite 123
36% 158 MB/s
4K Read 10.8
4K Write 28.6
4K Mixed 13.9
49% 17.8 MB/s
DQ Read 125
DQ Write 153
DQ Mixed 144
107% 140 MB/s
Poor: 41%
This bench: 36.2%
Great: 85%
Ricoh Memory Stick Disk Device 1GB
1GB free
Firmware: 02
SusWrite @10s intervals: 5.6 5.5 5.9 5.9 5.6 6 MB/s
Performing above expectations (85th percentile)
4.66% Terrible
Read 9
Write 4.2
Mixed 2.5
SusWrite 5.7
4% 5.35 MB/s
4K Read 4.8
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
200% 1.6 MB/s
Poor: 2%
This bench: 4.66%
Great: 5%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 6GB
null MHz
4096, 2048 MB
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
36.9% Below average
MC Read 15.1
MC Write 10.9
MC Mixed 11.4
36% 12.5 GB/s
SC Read 8.8
SC Write 10.1
SC Mixed 10.5
28% 9.8 GB/s
Latency 72.7
55% 72.7 ns
Poor: 12%
This bench: 36.9%
Great: 46%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical VPCF12S1E Builds (Compare 25 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 51%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

System: Sony VPCF12S1E

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 53% - Above average Total price: $225
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback