Performance Results


Gaming 4% Tree trunk	Desktop 36% Jet ski	Workstation 4% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (49th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 51 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 37%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics	2.39% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	41.5% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Windows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.

Sub-optimal background CPU (17%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing as expected (49^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Celeron J4125 2,594 User benchmarks, average bench 35% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2 GHz, turbo 2.6 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (64^th percentile)	37% Below average	Memory 37.7 1-Core 58.6 2-Core 114 39% 70.1 Pts	4-Core 209 8-Core 213 28% 211 Pts	64-Core 208 13% 208 Pts
Poor: 22% ↑ This bench: 37% Great: 43%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 600 35,976 User benchmarks, average bench 1% Device(0100 2782) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 30.0.101.1994 Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	2.39% Terrible	Lighting 2.3 Reflection 3.3 Parallax 3.7 2% 3.1 fps	MRender 4.1 Gravity 4.1 Splatting 4.2 3% 4.13 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 2.39% Great: 2%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Netac S535N8/256GYN 256GB 120 User benchmarks, average bench 60% 53GB free (System drive) Firmware: U0330A0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 66 35 4.9 76 2.9 76 MB/s Performing way below expectations (11^th percentile)	41.5% Average	Read 359 Write 275 Mixed 288 SusWrite 43.5 54% 241 MB/s	4K Read 13.4 4K Write 47.7 4K Mixed 13.9 63% 25 MB/s	DQ Read 172 DQ Write 74 DQ Mixed 0.4 33% 82.2 MB/s
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 41.5% Great: 80%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
ABCD 123456789012345678 4x2GB 5,869 User benchmarks, average bench 24% 4 of 4 slots used 8GB DIMM LPDDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz Performing below potential (21^st percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	20% Very poor	MC Read 5.9 MC Write 7.2 MC Mixed 9.5 22% 7.53 GB/s	SC Read 1.7 SC Write 4.6 SC Mixed 3.8 10% 3.37 GB/s	Latency 213 19% 213 ns
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 20% Great: 29%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 4%

Tree trunk

Desktop 34%

Sail boat

Workstation 4%

Tree trunk

CPU
Celeron J4125IntelBench 35%, 2,594 samples	49x

GPU
UHD Graphics 600IntelBench 1%, 35,976 samples	49x

RAM
123456789012345678 4x2GBABCDBench 24%, 5,869 samples	36x
123456789012345678 2x4GBABCDBench 24%, 783 samples	13x

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16