Razer Blade 15 Studio Edition - Late 2019

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 75%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 86%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 64%
Destroyer
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (60th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 40 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 76.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics91% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive193% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago.
SystemRazer Blade 15 Studio Edition - Late 2019  (all builds)
MotherboardRazer CH541
Memory21.8 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20190918
Uptime1 Days
Run DateMay 28 '22 at 06:13
Run Duration142 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing above expectations (60th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-9750H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 3.35 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
76.7% Very good
Memory 80.2
1-Core 123
2-Core 219
80% 141 Pts
4-Core 395
8-Core 568
60% 482 Pts
64-Core 682
42% 682 Pts
Poor: 49%
This bench: 76.7%
Great: 87%
Graphics Cards Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia Quadro RTX 5000 with Max-Q Design
Device(1A58 2008) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3000 MHz, Ram: 16GB, Driver: 512.15
Performing below potential (52nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
91% Outstanding
Lighting 105
Reflection 198
Parallax 128
85% 144 fps
MRender 157
Gravity 109
Splatting 115
102% 127 fps
Poor: 75%
This bench: 91%
Great: 102%
Intel UHD Graphics 630
Device(1A58 2008) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 26.20.100.7261
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
6.1% Terrible
Lighting 6.2
Reflection 9.8
Parallax 8.4
5% 8.13 fps
MRender 10.6
Gravity 7.4
Splatting 11.3
8% 9.77 fps
Poor: 4%
This bench: 6.1%
Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Liteon CA3-GD1024 1TB
484GB free (System drive)
Firmware: C5A0903
SusWrite @10s intervals: 440 665 670 558 428 299 MB/s
Performing below expectations (34th percentile)
193% Outstanding
Read 1,442
Write 1,902
Mixed 1,290
SusWrite 510
289% 1,286 MB/s
4K Read 51.8
4K Write 107
4K Mixed 65.8
220% 74.9 MB/s
DQ Read 968
DQ Write 665
DQ Mixed 802
602% 812 MB/s
Poor: 145%
This bench: 193%
Great: 246%
Blackbox Plus 5TB
4.5TB free
Firmware: 0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 14 14 14 14 15 14 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
13.5% Very poor
Read 32.8
Write 14.5
Mixed 19.4
SusWrite 14.1
15% 20.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 0.2
4K Mixed 0.2
63% 0.43 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 13.5%
Great: 58%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A2K43DB1-CTD 2x16GB
2 of 2 slots used
32GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
85.8% Excellent
MC Read 31.9
MC Write 34
MC Mixed 26.5
88% 30.8 GB/s
SC Read 17.4
SC Write 36.1
SC Mixed 26.5
76% 26.7 GB/s
Latency 80.1
50% 80.1 ns
Poor: 63%
This bench: 85.8%
Great: 89%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Blade 15 Studio Edition - Late 2019 Builds (Compare 48 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 13%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 13%
Tree trunk

System: Razer Blade 15 Studio Edition - Late 2019

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback