Lenovo 30A0CTO1WW

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 66%
Battle cruiser
Desktop
Desktop 75%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 55%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (29th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 71 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 72%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics90.6% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive57.6% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
2 years ago, 21 months ago.
SystemLenovo 30A0CTO1WW  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO SHARKBAY
Memory27.8 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180621
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 27 '22 at 22:17
Run Duration165 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU10%
Watch Gameplay: 2060 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (29th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E3-1275 v3
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
72% Very good
Memory 76.4
1-Core 93.1
2-Core 200
69% 123 Pts
4-Core 367
8-Core 511
55% 439 Pts
64-Core 536
33% 536 Pts
Poor: 68%
This bench: 72%
Great: 85%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2060-$288
Asus(1043 86F0) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2145 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 456.71
Performing below potential (63rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
90.6% Outstanding
Lighting 115
Reflection 105
Parallax 107
94% 109 fps
MRender 126
Gravity 101
Splatting 89.9
85% 106 fps
Poor: 80%
This bench: 90.6%
Great: 97%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intel Raid 0 Volume 256GB
40GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1.0.
SusWrite @10s intervals: 251 277 115 11 13 1.8 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
57.6% Above average
Read 1,001
Write 655
Mixed 31.8
SusWrite 111
98% 450 MB/s
4K Read 13.2
4K Write 12.4
4K Mixed 1
28% 8.87 MB/s
DQ Read 117
DQ Write 29
DQ Mixed 2.2
20% 49.5 MB/s
Poor: 57%
This bench: 57.6%
Great: 237%
Hitachi HUS724030ALE641 3TB
2TB free
Firmware: MJ8OA5F0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 30 36 37 39 37 36 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 46% Great: 89%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL RipjawsX DDR3 1600 C9 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR3 1600 MHz clocked @ 1333 MHz
Performing below potential (29th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
47.6% Average
MC Read 17.3
MC Write 18
MC Mixed 15
48% 16.8 GB/s
SC Read 12.4
SC Write 14.5
SC Mixed 13.5
38% 13.5 GB/s
Latency 87.5
46% 87.5 ns
Poor: 39%
This bench: 47.6%
Great: 65%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 30A0CTO1WW Builds (Compare 5 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 18%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 80%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 16%
Surfboard

System: Lenovo 30A0CTO1WW

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 44% - Average Total price: $92
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. Because UserBenchmark’s data often contradicts their marketing spiel, they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of money on flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers get comparable real-world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Additionally, brands spend more on marketing weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated the last 13 years to providing comprehensive and accurate data to our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again and collectively save millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback