Gigabyte GA-C621-WD12-IPMI

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 54%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 64%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 52%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (57th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 43 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 53.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics97.5% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive237% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
MotherboardGigabyte GA-C621-WD12-IPMI  (all builds)
Memory28 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20200721
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 27 '22 at 21:30
Run Duration323 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU10%

 PC Performing as expected (57th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: Intel Xeon Bronze 3204
CPU0, 2 CPU, 12 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 1.9 GHz, turbo 1.8 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
53.7% Above average
Memory 65.6
1-Core 57
2-Core 120
48% 80.8 Pts
4-Core 225
8-Core 479
41% 352 Pts
64-Core 700
43% 700 Pts
Poor: 43%
This bench: 53.7%
Great: 59%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2060-12GB
Asus(1043 886D) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2145 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 12GB, Driver: 497.09
Performing below potential (66th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
97.5% Outstanding
Lighting 124
Reflection 109
Parallax 135
101% 123 fps
MRender 130
Gravity 114
Splatting 95.7
91% 113 fps
Poor: 86%
This bench: 97.5%
Great: 102%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Gigabyte Aorus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$80
885GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EGFM13.2 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1609 1643 1666 1648 1667 1656 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
237% Outstanding
Read 1,441
Write 1,815
Mixed 1,521
SusWrite 1,648
364% 1,606 MB/s
4K Read 40
4K Write 84.8
4K Mixed 53.8
174% 59.5 MB/s
DQ Read 640
DQ Write 450
DQ Mixed 554
412% 548 MB/s
Poor: 215%
This bench: 237%
Great: 491%
Intel SSDSC2BX200G4 200GB
165GB free
Firmware: G2010160
SusWrite @10s intervals: 222 224 224 226 226 226 MB/s
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
76.9% Very good
Read 352
Write 228
Mixed 239
SusWrite 225
58% 261 MB/s
4K Read 29.1
4K Write 72.7
4K Mixed 30
121% 43.9 MB/s
DQ Read 333
DQ Write 221
DQ Mixed 232
185% 262 MB/s
Poor: 56%
This bench: 76.9%
Great: 85%
WDC WD201KRYZ-01BBDB0 20TB
18.5TB free
Firmware: 01.01H01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 257 260 260 259 262 256 MB/s
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
28.2% Poor
Read 225
Write 240
Mixed 126
SusWrite 259
48% 212 MB/s
4K Read 1.7
4K Write 14
4K Mixed 1
11% 5.57 MB/s
DQ Read 2.2
DQ Write 10.2
DQ Mixed 5.4
4% 5.93 MB/s
Poor: 17%
This bench: 28.2%
Great: 31%
Amd-raid WDC WD6003FRYZ-0 6TB
5TB free
Firmware: 01.01H01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 251 243 250 254 239 251 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
139% Outstanding
Read 237
Write 239
Mixed 108
SusWrite 248
152% 208 MB/s
4K Read 1.5
4K Write 5.4
4K Mixed 1.8
362% 2.9 MB/s
Poor: 68%
This bench: 139%
Great: 140%
USB DISK 2.0 16GB
14GB free, PID 3e00
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 7.9 5.2 4.9 4.9 5.2 5.2 MB/s
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
6% Terrible
Read 16.5
Write 8
Mixed 6
SusWrite 5.5
11% 9 MB/s
4K Read 5
4K Write 0.4
4K Mixed 0.7
56% 2.03 MB/s
Poor: 3%
This bench: 6%
Great: 8%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M393A2K40BB2-CTD 2x16GB
2 of 12 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 2666 MHz clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (10th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
38.9% Below average
MC Read 17
MC Write 13.9
MC Mixed 13.5
42% 14.8 GB/s
SC Read 6.6
SC Write 5.9
SC Mixed 5.6
17% 6.03 GB/s
Latency 112
36% 112 ns
Poor: 36%
This bench: 38.9%
Great: 70%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-C621-WD12-IPMI Builds (Compare 4 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 53%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 64%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 52%
Yacht

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-C621-WD12-IPMI

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 147% - Outstanding Total price: $80
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $361Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback