| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (34th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 66 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
| Processor | With an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 24.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor. |
| Graphics | 0.81% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | 31.9% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times. |
| Memory | 3GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 3GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Sub-optimal background CPU (15%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
| System | HP Presario CQ43 Notebook PC (all builds) |
| Motherboard | Hewlett-Packard 3577 |
| Memory | 0.6 GB free of 3 GB @ 1.1 GHz |
| Display | 1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colores |
| OS | Windows 10 |
| BIOS Date | 20111218 |
| Uptime | 0 Days |
| Run Date | May 27 '22 at 20:53 |
| Run Duration | 221 Seconds |
| Run User | COL-User |
| Background CPU | 15% |
PC Performing below expectations (34th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
AMD E-350
Socket FT1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 1.6 GHz, turbo 1.6 GHz (avg)
|
24.7%
Poor
|
23% 32.6 Pts
|
5% 36.3 Pts
|
2% 35.4 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
AMD Radeon HD 6310
HP(103C 3577) 384MB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.201.1151.0
|
0.81%
Terrible
|
1% 1.23 fps
|
1% 1.17 fps
| |
| Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Gigabyte SSD 120GB-$30
85GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFM61.5
SusWrite @10s intervals: 186 189 57 55 57 59 MB/s
|
31.9%
Below average
|
49% 220 MB/s
|
35% 11.4 MB/s
|
42% 60.7 MB/s
|
|
MXT-USB Storage Device 34GB
24GB free, PID 8816
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 7.6 7.9 7.6 8.4 8.7 8.4 MB/s
|
3.48%
Terrible
|
10% 7.78 MB/s
|
5% 0.43 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Micron 4JSF12864HZ-1G4D1 Samsung M471B5773CHS-CH9 3GB
1066, 1066 MHz
1024, 2048 MB
Performing below potential (14th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
12.2%
Very poor
|
12% 4.07 GB/s
|
9% 3.1 GB/s
|
21% 187 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical Presario CQ43 Notebook PC Builds (Compare 92 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
System: HP Presario CQ43 Notebook PC
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Core i5-2410MIntel $160Bench 48%, 46,742 samples | 22x |
| Core i3-2330MIntel $150Bench 47%, 20,066 samples | 17x |
| Celeron B815IntelBench 42%, 2,620 samples | 9x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| HD 3000 (Mobile V1 1.1/1.2 GHz)IntelBench 2%, 209,058 samples | 51x |
| HD Graphics (G2 Pentium/Celeron 1.1/1.15 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 45,735 samples | 18x |
| Radeon HD 6310AMDBench 1%, 13,166 samples | 14x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 51% - Above average | Total price: $188 |