Lenovo 10AGS12V00

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 62%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (65th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 35 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 60%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics1.67% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive74.9% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemLenovo 10AGS12V00  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO SHARKBAY
Memory13.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1440 x 900 - 32 Bit renk
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20211223
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 27 '22 at 19:55
Run Duration132 Seconds
Run User TUR-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing above expectations (65th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-4160-$79
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
60% Good
Memory 72.6
1-Core 102
2-Core 181
68% 119 Pts
4-Core 276
8-Core 271
37% 274 Pts
64-Core 270
17% 270 Pts
Poor: 34%
This bench: 60%
Great: 67%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon R5 230
PwrHis(1787 2300) 2GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.201.1151.1008
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
1.67% Terrible
Lighting 2.1
Reflection 2.4
Parallax 2
2% 2.17 fps
MRender 1.9
Gravity 2
Splatting 1.9
2% 1.93 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.67%
Great: 2%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Hs-ssd-c100 120G 120GB
72GB free (System drive)
Firmware: V4.15.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 267 279 289 283 288 305 MB/s
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
74.9% Very good
Read 426
Write 365
Mixed 317
SusWrite 285
78% 349 MB/s
4K Read 28.9
4K Write 83.5
4K Mixed 15.6
108% 42.7 MB/s
DQ Read 193
DQ Write 226
DQ Mixed 30
72% 150 MB/s
Poor: 37%
This bench: 74.9%
Great: 98%
Kioxia-exceria SSD 500GB
466GB free
Firmware: ECFA12.b
SusWrite @10s intervals: 889 897 816 844 848 716 MB/s
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
176% Outstanding
Read 679
Write 756
Mixed 767
SusWrite 835
172% 759 MB/s
4K Read 40.6
4K Write 110
4K Mixed 60.1
197% 70.4 MB/s
DQ Read 973
DQ Write 661
DQ Mixed 788
596% 807 MB/s
Poor: 110%
This bench: 176%
Great: 240%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMT451U6BFR8C-PB Ramaxel RMR5030ME68F9F1600 Samsung M378B5173QH0-CK0 Ramaxel RMR5030MP68F9F1600 16GB
1600, 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
56.3% Above average
MC Read 20.1
MC Write 21.7
MC Mixed 17.1
56% 19.6 GB/s
SC Read 16.2
SC Write 19.5
SC Mixed 20.4
53% 18.7 GB/s
Latency 95.5
42% 95.5 ns
Poor: 55%
This bench: 56.3%
Great: 57%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 10AGS12V00 Builds (Compare 12 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 59%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk

System: Lenovo 10AGS12V00

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 78% - Very good Total price: $79
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback