Lenovo 30B6S09K09

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 23%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 21%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (74th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 26 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 72.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics21.9% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive161% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemLenovo 30B6S09K09  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO 1030
Memory11.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20211224
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 27 '22 at 18:08
Run Duration161 Seconds
Run User POL-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing above expectations (74th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E5-2620 v4
LGA2011-3 SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 2.1 GHz, turbo 2.5 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
72.2% Very good
Memory 82.2
1-Core 71.7
2-Core 162
62% 105 Pts
4-Core 336
8-Core 540
54% 438 Pts
64-Core 769
48% 769 Pts
Poor: 57%
This bench: 72.2%
Great: 74%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia Quadro M2000
Nvidia(10DE 1190) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1228 MHz, MLim: 1651 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 512.78
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
21.9% Poor
Lighting 26.6
Reflection 30.7
Parallax 27.5
22% 28.3 fps
MRender 24.8
Gravity 28.1
Splatting 28.5
22% 27.1 fps
Poor: 20%
This bench: 21.9%
Great: 22%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZVLQ256HBJD-00BH1 256GB
190GB free (System drive)
Firmware: HPS1NFAV
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1115 1165 1099 163 202 203 MB/s
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
161% Outstanding
Read 1,227
Write 1,154
Mixed 1010
SusWrite 658
227% 1,012 MB/s
4K Read 36.6
4K Write 74.9
4K Mixed 50.2
160% 53.9 MB/s
DQ Read 610
DQ Write 380
DQ Mixed 486
365% 492 MB/s
Poor: 56%
This bench: 161%
Great: 200%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M393A1G43EB1-CRC 2x8GB
2 of 12 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing as expected (46th percentile)
70.2% Very good
MC Read 30.3
MC Write 24.9
MC Mixed 23.3
75% 26.2 GB/s
SC Read 12.7
SC Write 16
SC Mixed 17.6
44% 15.4 GB/s
Latency 76.6
52% 76.6 ns
Poor: 40%
This bench: 70.2%
Great: 76%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 30B6S09K09 Builds (Compare 11 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 25%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 23%
Surfboard

System: Lenovo 30B6S09K09

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 68% - Good Total price: $84
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback