Asus Pro WS C621-64L SAGE Series

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 93%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 93%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 95%
Nuclear submarine
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (61st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 39 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 86.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics101% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive261% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory128GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 128GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemAsus Pro WS C621-64L SAGE Series  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK Pro WS C621-64L SAGE Series
Memory123.3 GB free of 128 GB @ 2.9 GHz
Display1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210609
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 27 '22 at 15:35
Run Duration126 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing above expectations (61st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon W-3225
CPU1, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 3.65 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
86.5% Excellent
Memory 76.2
1-Core 134
2-Core 268
86% 159 Pts
4-Core 518
8-Core 982
89% 750 Pts
64-Core 1,340
83% 1,340 Pts
Poor: 73%
This bench: 86.5%
Great: 88%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3060-$253
EVGA(3842 3656) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2145 MHz, MLim: 3750 MHz, Ram: 12GB, Driver: 472.12
Performing below potential (62nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
101% Outstanding
Lighting 132
Reflection 122
Parallax 124
108% 126 fps
MRender 142
Gravity 104
Splatting 89.8
89% 112 fps
Poor: 90%
This bench: 101%
Great: 106%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Black SN750 SE NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$85
836GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 711130WD Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2205 1923 1888 1776 196 257 MB/s
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
261% Outstanding
Read 1,468
Write 1,936
Mixed 1,514
SusWrite 1,374
356% 1,573 MB/s
4K Read 38.4
4K Write 237
4K Mixed 55
254% 110 MB/s
DQ Read 1,149
DQ Write 749
DQ Mixed 989
727% 962 MB/s
Poor: 143%
This bench: 261%
Great: 333%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 4x31.8GB
4 of 12 slots used
127GB DIMM DDR4 2933 MHz clocked @ 2666 MHz
Performing below potential (56th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
105% Outstanding
MC Read 37
MC Write 55
MC Mixed 35.3
121% 42.4 GB/s
SC Read 8.3
SC Write 22.1
SC Mixed 10.7
39% 13.7 GB/s
Latency 87.9
46% 87.9 ns
Poor: 61%
This bench: 105%
Great: 156%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Pro WS C621-64L SAGE Series Builds (Compare 9 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 153%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 83%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 191%
UFO

System: Asus Pro WS C621-64L SAGE Series

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 42% - Average Total price: $1,198
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060 $291WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $145
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback