Apple MacBook10,1

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (78th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 22 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 50.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics5.14% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemApple MacBook10,1  (all builds)
MotherboardApple Mac-EE2EBD4B90B839A8
Memory5.2 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.9 GHz
Display2304 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20220316
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 27 '22 at 15:27
Run Duration134 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU3%

 PC Performing above expectations (78th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core m3-7Y32
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 1.2 GHz, turbo 2.6 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (44th percentile)
50.1% Above average
Memory 63.4
1-Core 89.8
2-Core 146
58% 99.7 Pts
4-Core 213
8-Core 216
29% 215 Pts
64-Core 218
14% 218 Pts
Poor: 24%
This bench: 50.1%
Great: 56%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 615 (Mobile Kaby Lake)
Apple(106B 0178) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 30.0.101.1371
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
5.14% Terrible
Lighting 5.3
Reflection 5.6
Parallax 6.1
4% 5.67 fps
MRender 7.4
Gravity 5.3
Splatting 10.9
7% 7.87 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 5.14%
Great: 5%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Apple APPLE SSD AP0256 251GB
61GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 16.1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 627 603 768 648 340 546 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 41% Great: 67%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 0x4D5435324C3531324D3634443450512D3130 2x4GB
2 of 2 slots used
8GB SODIMM LPDDR3 clocked @ 1867 MHz
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
64.4% Good
MC Read 22.6
MC Write 25.2
MC Mixed 21.9
66% 23.2 GB/s
SC Read 13.3
SC Write 26.5
SC Mixed 20.3
57% 20 GB/s
Latency 118
34% 118 ns
Poor: 39%
This bench: 64.4%
Great: 65%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical MacBook10,1 Builds (Compare 3 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 49%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

System: Apple MacBook10,1

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing charade so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit a lot from flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they've no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to market inferior products. UserBenchmark's data challenges the marketing and exposes the youtubers' biases.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. The 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we've dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data which saves our users millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback