Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 1% Tree trunk	Desktop 35% Sail boat	Workstation 1% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (41st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 59 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 40.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics	1.19% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Very high background CPU (31%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing as expected (41^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Xeon E5410 605 User benchmarks, average bench 44% CPU0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.35 GHz Performing below expectations (29^th percentile)	40.9% Average	Memory 60.9 1-Core 36 2-Core 71.8 37% 56.2 Pts	4-Core 122 8-Core 130 17% 126 Pts	64-Core 141 9% 141 Pts
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 40.9% Great: 50%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia Quadro FX 1700 2,013 User benchmarks, average bench 1% Nvidia(10DE 049A) 512MB Ram: 512MB, Driver: 342.01 Performing as expected (50^th percentile)	1.19% Terrible	Lighting 1.3 Reflection 2.2 Parallax 0.7 1% 1.4 fps	MRender 2.3 Gravity 1.2 Splatting 1.8 2% 1.77 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 1.19% Great: 1%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 500GB-$22 107,978 User benchmarks, average bench 54% 412GB free (System drive) Firmware: HP63 SusWrite @10s intervals: 104 109 109 107 117 121 MB/s Performing above expectations (83^rd percentile)	65.4% Good	Read 116 Write 120 Mixed 53.8 SusWrite 111 73% 100 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 2.1 4K Mixed 1.1 190% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 28% ↑ This bench: 65.4% Great: 70%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 4x4GB 106,178 User benchmarks, average bench 43% 4 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR2 Performing way below expectations (1^st percentile)	14.5% Very poor	MC Read 3 MC Write 6.3 MC Mixed 4.4 13% 4.57 GB/s	SC Read 2.6 SC Write 5.3 SC Mixed 3.4 11% 3.77 GB/s	Latency 125 32% 125 ns
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 14.5% Great: 61%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 0%

Incomplete

Desktop 0%

Incomplete

Workstation 0%

Incomplete

CPU
Xeon E5410IntelBench 44%, 605 samples	1x

GPU
Quadro FX 1700NvidiaBench 1%, 2,013 samples	1x

RAM
4x4GBUnknownBench 43%, 106,178 samples	1x