Asrock H510M-HDV

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (66th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 34 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 70.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics3.32% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive68.9% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Sub-optimal background CPU (16%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsrock H510M-HDV  (all builds)
Memory12.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit색
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20210723
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 27 '22 at 03:29
Run Duration148 Seconds
Run User KOR-User
Background CPU 16%

 PC Performing above expectations (66th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Pentium Gold G6405
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 4.1 GHz, turbo 4.1 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
70.1% Very good
Memory 92.1
1-Core 116
2-Core 202
80% 137 Pts
4-Core 282
8-Core 272
37% 277 Pts
64-Core 304
19% 304 Pts
Poor: 39%
This bench: 70.1%
Great: 73%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 610
ASRock(1849 9BA8) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 27.20.100.9415
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
3.32% Terrible
Lighting 3
Reflection 5
Parallax 3.9
2% 3.97 fps
MRender 6.5
Gravity 3.3
Splatting 7.9
5% 5.9 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 3.32%
Great: 3%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Klevv NEO N400 SSD 120GB
77GB free (System drive)
Firmware: T1125A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 342 353 360 279 292 81 MB/s
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
68.9% Good
Read 359
Write 329
Mixed 275
SusWrite 284
70% 312 MB/s
4K Read 21.8
4K Write 80.1
4K Mixed 16.1
96% 39.3 MB/s
DQ Read 91.3
DQ Write 319
DQ Mixed 25.9
72% 145 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 68.9%
Great: 85%
Acasis ASM1153 480GB
42GB free
Firmware: 0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 247 276 287 177 91 72 MB/s
Performing below expectations (30th percentile)
42.9% Average
Read 345
Write 230
Mixed 257
SusWrite 192
57% 256 MB/s
4K Read 19.4
4K Write 8.1
4K Mixed 10.6
47% 12.7 MB/s
DQ Read 135
DQ Write 11.3
DQ Mixed 19.2
28% 55.2 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 42.9%
Great: 61%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Tammuz Co Ltd TZD1G808U26-SN001 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
80.8% Excellent
MC Read 29.2
MC Write 31.3
MC Mixed 25.7
82% 28.7 GB/s
SC Read 17.1
SC Write 31.5
SC Mixed 23.2
68% 23.9 GB/s
Latency 63.8
63% 63.8 ns
Poor: 68%
This bench: 80.8%
Great: 83%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical H510M-HDV Builds (Compare 553 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 44%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 88%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 40%
Speed boat

Motherboard: Asrock H510M-HDV

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 77% - Very good Total price: $291
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback