TEST
YOUR PC
ADD TO PC
BUILD

MSI MS-16V3

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
Save results Copy results User guide
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (62nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 38 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 87.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Boot Drive297% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemMicro-Star GS66 Stealth 10UE
MotherboardMSI MS-16V3  (all builds)
Memory27.1 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210308
Uptime0.4 Days
Run DateMay 26 '22 at 22:56
Run Duration154 Seconds
Run User TUN-User
Background CPU7%

 PC Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-10870H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
87.5% Excellent
Memory 92.3
1-Core 124
2-Core 244
87% 154 Pts
4-Core 445
8-Core 752
73% 599 Pts
64-Core 991
61% 991 Pts
Poor: 54% ↑
This bench: 87.5%
 Great: 92%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3060 (Laptop)
MSI(1462 12ED) ≥ 4GB
Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 30.0.15.1295
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
Lighting 102
Reflection 117
Parallax 104
83% 108 fps
Gravity 89.5
Splatting 83.1
76% 86.3 fps
Poor: 67% Great: 105%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intel Raid 0 Volume 2TB
616GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1.0.00
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1889 2111 2129 2194 1581 1300 MB/s
Performing as expected (48th percentile)
297% Outstanding
Read 2150
Write 2,314
Mixed 2,007
SusWrite 1,867
470% 2,085 MB/s
4K Read 40.7
4K Write 116
4K Mixed 60.6
201% 72.5 MB/s
DQ Read 885
DQ Write 679
DQ Mixed 750
570% 771 MB/s
Poor: 141% ↑
This bench: 297%
 Great: 531%
G-tech ArmorATD 5TB
2TB free
Firmware: 2007
SusWrite @10s intervals: 85 85 85 86 86 86 MB/s
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
52.2% Above average
Read 94.4
Write 78.7
Mixed 63.7
SusWrite 85.5
60% 80.6 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 6.3
4K Mixed 0.8
260% 2.8 MB/s
Poor: 17% ↑
This bench: 52.2%
 Great: 70%
WD My Passport 260F 5TB
2TB free, PID 260f
Operating at USB 3.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 79 80 80 79 79 78 MB/s
Performing as expected (44th percentile)
41.9% Average
Read 87.6
Write 75.5
Mixed 56.4
SusWrite 79.1
99% 74.7 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 3.8
4K Mixed 0.7
158% 1.9 MB/s
Poor: 17% ↑
This bench: 41.9%
 Great: 66%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A2K43EB1-CWE 2x16GB
2 of 2 slots used
32GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
99.1% Outstanding
MC Read 36.8
MC Write 39.4
MC Mixed 29.9
101% 35.4 GB/s
SC Read 19.4
SC Write 43.6
SC Mixed 29.8
88% 30.9 GB/s
Latency 63.5
63% 63.5 ns
Poor: 58% ↑
This bench: 99.1%
 Great: 106%
Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU GPU SSD HDD RAM MBD
Typical MS-16V3 Builds (Compare 646 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 14%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 14%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: MSI MS-16V3

CPU
Core i7-10870HIntelBench 79%, 23,498 samples354x
Core i7-10750HIntelBench 77%, 206,796 samples212x
Core i7-10875HIntelBench 79%, 35,361 samples48x
GPU
UHD GraphicsIntelBench 5%, 187,969 samples278x
RTX 3060 (Laptop)NvidiaBench 90%, 102,706 samples189x
RTX 3070 (Laptop)NvidiaBench 114%, 45,297 samples95x
SSD
PC SN730 SDBPNTY-1T00-1032 1TBWDCBench 252%, 11,331 samples249x
MZVLB1T0HBLR-00000 1TBSamsungBench 275%, 9,396 samples99x
MZVLB2T0HMLB-00000 2TBSamsungBench 262%, 1,110 samples94x
RAM
HMAA2GS6AJR8N-XN 2x16GBHynixBench 86%, 4,405 samples202x
M471A1K43DB1-CWE 2x8GBSamsungBench 86%, 69,946 samples192x
M471A2G43AB2-CWE 2x16GBSamsungBench 86%, 11,002 samples60x
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. When UserBenchmark’s data contradicts their marketing spiel, they deflect by systematically attacking our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a large proportion lot of their profit from flagship hardware sales (4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc.). UserBenchmark's data helps consumers to choose hardware that offers similar real world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to make positive content about us. In addition, the brands with weaker products tend to spend more on youtube marketing, which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community that's open and accessible to all. Looking at its 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, which are mostly written by virgin accounts, it is glaringly obvious that they were created by a marketing team. Real users don’t have any time or interest to promote one brand over another.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of trying to win lucrative sponsorship deals with billion dollar PC brands, we have spent the last 13 years 100% focussed on providing comprehensive, accurate and relevant information for our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again because collectively they save millions of dollars every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest
Amazon Ebay
deals
CPU GPU SSD HDD USB RAM MBD
Build Test EFps
Can You Run It?
►
YouTube
*NEW*
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback