Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (28th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 72 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 38.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Boot Drive	42% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Windows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.

Very high background CPU (75%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	Emachines E525 (all builds)
Motherboard	eMachines eMachines E525
Memory	1.3 GB free of 4 GB @ 0.7 GHz
Display	1366 x 768 - 32 Bit Farben, 1366 x 768 - 32 Bit Farben, 2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit Farben
OS	Windows 11
BIOS Date	20090311
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	May 26 '22 at 20:58
Run Duration	130 Seconds
Run User	CHE-User
Background CPU	75%

PC Performing below expectations (28^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core2 Duo T9600-$170 2,726 User benchmarks, average bench 39% uPGA-478, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 2.7 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (40^th percentile)	38.9% Below average	Memory 67.3 1-Core 40.4 2-Core 54.5 38% 54.1 Pts	4-Core 63.4 8-Core 65.2 9% 64.3 Pts	64-Core 73.8 5% 73.8 Pts
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 38.9% Great: 44%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kioxia-exceria SATA SSD 480GB 7,893 User benchmarks, average bench 78% 177GB free (System drive) Firmware: SBFA15.3 SusWrite @10s intervals: 113 96 94 99 97 72 MB/s Performing below potential (4^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	42% Average	Read 133 Write 95.3 Mixed 177 SusWrite 95.3 28% 125 MB/s	4K Read 24 4K Write 34.8 4K Mixed 25.4 87% 28.1 MB/s	DQ Read 96.2 DQ Write 71.7 DQ Mixed 81.9 62% 83.3 MB/s
Poor: 45% ↑ This bench: 42% Great: 100%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 2x2GB 446,702 User benchmarks, average bench 20% 2 of 2 slots used 4GB SODIMM DDR2 Performing as expected (42^nd percentile)	16.2% Very poor	MC Read 5.9 MC Write 5.1 MC Mixed 4.2 14% 5.07 GB/s	SC Read 4.1 SC Write 4.7 SC Mixed 3.8 12% 4.2 GB/s	Latency 108 37% 108 ns
Poor: 10% ↑ This bench: 16.2% Great: 44%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 2%

Tree trunk

Desktop 31%

Sail boat

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

CPU
Celeron 900IntelBench 30%, 3,169 samples	8x
Celeron Dual Core T3100IntelBench 34%, 976 samples	3x
Pentium T4200Intel $99Bench 34%, 5,474 samples	2x

GPU
Mobile Series 4 Express Chipset FamilyIntelBench 0%, 23,924 samples	16x
Intel 45 Express Chipset FamilyMobileBench 1%, 2,404 samples	2x

SSD
SATA SSD 480GBKioxia-exceriaBench 78%, 7,893 samples	2x
Z400s 128GBSanDisk $109Bench 61%, 10,807 samples	1x
X400 2.5 7MM 256 256GBSandiskBench 72%, 39 samples	1x

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16