Gigabyte GA-Z97X-UD3H-BK-CF

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 58%
Gunboat
Desktop
Desktop 86%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 49%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (51st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 49 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 81.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics67.6% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (30%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemGigabyte Z97X-UD3H-BK
MotherboardGigabyte GA-Z97X-UD3H-BK-CF  (all builds)
Memory4.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.8 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, , 800 x 600 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150421
Uptime0.5 Days
Run DateOct 07 '17 at 03:51
Run Duration381 Seconds
Run User AUS-User
Background CPU 30%
Watch Gameplay: 1060-6GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (51st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4790K-$348
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 4.4 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
81.9% Excellent
Memory 84.4
1-Core 130
2-Core 240
85% 151 Pts
4-Core 428
8-Core 623
66% 525 Pts
64-Core 621
38% 621 Pts
Poor: 67%
This bench: 81.9%
Great: 87%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 2367 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 385.69
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
67.6% Good
Lighting 84.9
Reflection 79
Parallax 73.8
69% 79.2 fps
MRender 82.7
Gravity 75.3
Splatting 78.7
64% 78.9 fps
Poor: 51%
This bench: 67.6%
Great: 60%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston SSDNow UV400 120GB-$35
35GB free
Firmware: 0C3J96R9 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below expectations (26th percentile)
60.7% Good
Read 463
Write 200
Mixed 224
65% 295 MB/s
4K Read 24
4K Write 49.2
4K Mixed 8.61
73% 27.3 MB/s
DQ Read 273
DQ Write 140
DQ Mixed 27.4
68% 147 MB/s
Poor: 44%
This bench: 60.7%
Great: 82%
Kingston SV100S264G 64GB
2GB free
Firmware: 120504 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
28.9% Poor
Read 246
Write 112
Mixed 130
36% 162 MB/s
4K Read 9.97
4K Write 26.9
4K Mixed 7.3
39% 14.7 MB/s
DQ Read 11.8
DQ Write 23.2
DQ Mixed 7.12
8% 14.1 MB/s
Poor: 9%
This bench: 28.9%
Great: 30%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$28
2TB free
Firmware: 100. Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 52% Great: 109%
WD Black 1TB (2010)-$34
2TB free
Firmware: 05.01D06 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 35% Great: 76%
WD Green 2TB (2011)-$55
2TB free
Firmware: 80.00A80 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 31% Great: 67%
WD WD10EACS-00ZJB0 1TB
2TB free
Firmware: 01.01B01 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 26% Great: 51%
Seagate Desktop SSHD 4TB-$230
2TB free
Firmware: CC44 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below expectations (30th percentile)
64.8% Good
Read 111
Write 114
Mixed 104
82% 110 MB/s
4K Read 0.41
4K Write 5.28
4K Mixed 0.57
179% 2.09 MB/s
Poor: 44%
This bench: 64.8%
Great: 94%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 2TB-$37
1TB free (System drive)
Firmware: CC29 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below expectations (35th percentile)
82.1% Excellent
Read 152
Write 135
Mixed 144
108% 144 MB/s
4K Read 0.44
4K Write 1.28
4K Mixed 0.24
69% 0.65 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 82.1%
Great: 114%
Seagate Barracuda Green 2TB-$95
69GB free
Firmware: CC32 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
37% Below average
Read 67.6
Write 61.3
Mixed 54.5
46% 61.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.45
4K Write 0.76
4K Mixed 0.41
79% 0.54 MB/s
Poor: 38%
This bench: 37%
Great: 75%
SanDisk Extreme USB 3.0 32GB-$28
0GB free, PID 5580
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Performing as expected (49th percentile)
69.8% Good
Read 245
Write 17.7
Mixed 19.9
74% 94.2 MB/s
4K Read 11.2
4K Write 9.04
4K Mixed 5.03
520% 8.42 MB/s
DQ Read 13
DQ Write 4.79
DQ Mixed 5.26
390% 7.68 MB/s
Poor: 25%
This bench: 69.8%
Great: 93%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CMZ4GX3M1A1600C9 Kingston KHX2133C11D3/4GX 0215 CMZ4GX3M1A1600C9 Kingston KHX2133C11D3/4GX 16GB
1800, 1800, 1800, 1800 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
62.1% Good
MC Read 21.1
MC Write 24.1
MC Mixed 20
62% 21.7 GB/s
SC Read 15.4
SC Write 21.6
SC Mixed 19.9
54% 19 GB/s
Latency 72.8
55% 72.8 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-Z97X-UD3H-BK-CF Builds (Compare 587 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 43%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 85%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 36%
Jet ski

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-Z97X-UD3H-BK-CF

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 62% - Good Total price: $642
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback