Asus N61Jq

Performance Results


Gaming 4% Tree trunk	Desktop 58% Gunboat	Workstation 4% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (60th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 40 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 59%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	4.63% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	47.5% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 8.1 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen.

Run History

2 years ago, 24 months ago, 24 months ago.

System	Asus N61Jq (all builds)
Motherboard	ASUSTeK N61Jq
Memory	4.6 GB free of 6 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display	1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 8.1
BIOS Date	20100330
Uptime	3.5 Days
Run Date	May 26 '22 at 17:42
Run Duration	135 Seconds
Run User	KAZ-User
Background CPU	3%

PC Performing above expectations (60^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7 Q 720-$220 13,149 User benchmarks, average bench 51% Socket 989, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 1.6 GHz, turbo 1.65 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (93^rd percentile)	59% Above average	Memory 91.2 1-Core 68.4 2-Core 112 59% 90.5 Pts	4-Core 151 8-Core 199 22% 175 Pts	64-Core 199 12% 199 Pts
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 59% Great: 60%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD Mobility Radeon HD 5730 2,535 User benchmarks, average bench 4% Asus(1043 1C22) 1GB Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 13.251.9001.1001 Performing above expectations (82^nd percentile)	4.63% Terrible	Lighting 5.7 Reflection 6.8 Parallax 4.9 5% 5.8 fps	MRender 5.9 Gravity 4.4 Splatting 6.3 5% 5.53 fps
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 4.63% Great: 5%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100 951,591 User benchmarks, average bench 103% 83GB free (System drive) Firmware: EMT02B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 219 222 224 218 218 217 MB/s Performing below potential (0^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	47.5% Average	Read 236 Write 216 Mixed 216 SusWrite 220 50% 222 MB/s	4K Read 16.5 4K Write 16.3 4K Mixed 16 54% 16.3 MB/s	DQ Read 176 DQ Write 177 DQ Mixed 177 133% 177 MB/s
Poor: 72% ↑ This bench: 47.5% Great: 124%
Xraydisk 1TB 1TB 126 User benchmarks, average bench 125% 470GB free Firmware: 190507 SusWrite @10s intervals: 72 25 26 16 32 16 MB/s Relative performance (0^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	22.1% Poor	Read 190 Write 105 Mixed 104 SusWrite 31.2 24% 108 MB/s	4K Read 10.8 4K Write 14.5 4K Mixed 10.4 37% 11.9 MB/s	DQ Read 24.5 DQ Write 25 DQ Mixed 20.4 16% 23.3 MB/s
Poor: 41% ↑ This bench: 22.1% Great: 251%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston ASU1333D3S9DR8G/4G 80AD HMT125S6BFR8C-G7 6GB 17 User benchmarks, average bench 29% 1067, 1067 MHz 4096, 2048 MB Performing above expectations (65^th percentile)	30.6% Below average	MC Read 11.2 MC Write 8.6 MC Mixed 8.4 27% 9.4 GB/s	SC Read 10.1 SC Write 10.5 SC Mixed 9.6 29% 10.1 GB/s	Latency 65.4 61% 65.4 ns
Poor: 24% ↑ This bench: 30.6% Great: 33%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical N61Jq Builds (Compare 88 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 3%

Tree trunk

Desktop 49%

Yacht

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

System: Asus N61Jq

CPU
Core i7 Q 720Intel $220Bench 51%, 13,149 samples	65x
Core i7 Q 740Intel $190Bench 54%, 13,278 samples	23x

GPU
Mobility Radeon HD 5730AMDBench 4%, 2,535 samples	88x

SSD
Green 120GB (2018)WD $59Bench 43%, 69,933 samples	3x
BX500 480GBCrucial $38Bench 63%, 83,298 samples	3x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	3x

RAM
ASU1333D3S9DR8/2G 2x2GBKingstonBench 27%, 948 samples	11x
HMT125S6BFR8C-G7 2x2GBHynixBench 24%, 1,873 samples	9x
HMT125S6TFR8C-H9 2x2GBHynixBench 29%, 1,376 samples	7x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 44% - Average

Total price: $279

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $128	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $165	Nvidia RTX 4070 $542	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $29

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16