Asus Pro WS C621-64L SAGE Series

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 108%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 89%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 129%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (74th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 26 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 81.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics132% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive311% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
2 years ago, 23 months ago.
SystemAsus Pro WS C621-64L SAGE Series  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK Pro WS C621-64L SAGE Series
Memory28.8 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit renk
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20210609
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 26 '22 at 10:06
Run Duration133 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU2%
Watch Gameplay: 2080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (74th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon Gold 6148
CPU1, 1 CPU, 20 cores, 40 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 3.15 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
81.1% Excellent
Memory 83.5
1-Core 112
2-Core 224
79% 140 Pts
4-Core 422
8-Core 827
74% 625 Pts
64-Core 2,301
142% 2,301 Pts
Poor: 70%
This bench: 81.1%
Great: 80%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2080-$270
CLim: 2190 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 456.71
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
132% Outstanding
Lighting 181
Reflection 174
Parallax 177
148% 177 fps
MRender 187
Gravity 152
Splatting 129
125% 156 fps
Poor: 109%
This bench: 132%
Great: 134%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Wd_black SN850 NVMe 1TB
889GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 611100WD Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1948 1823 1818 1813 1817 1808 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
311% Outstanding
Read 1,789
Write 1800
Mixed 1718
SusWrite 1,838
403% 1,786 MB/s
4K Read 53.5
4K Write 173
4K Mixed 65.5
256% 97.2 MB/s
DQ Read 1,303
DQ Write 914
DQ Mixed 1,096
822% 1,105 MB/s
Poor: 260%
This bench: 311%
Great: 604%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M393A2K40CB2-CTD 2x16GB
2 of 12 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2666 MHz
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
65.1% Good
MC Read 22.4
MC Write 29.8
MC Mixed 21
70% 24.4 GB/s
SC Read 8
SC Write 20.3
SC Mixed 10.3
37% 12.9 GB/s
Latency 74.4
54% 74.4 ns
Poor: 34%
This bench: 65.1%
Great: 68%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Pro WS C621-64L SAGE Series Builds (Compare 9 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 153%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 83%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 191%
UFO

System: Asus Pro WS C621-64L SAGE Series

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 42% - Average Total price: $1,198
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. Because UserBenchmark’s data often contradicts their marketing spiel, they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of money on flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers get comparable real-world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Additionally, brands spend more on marketing weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated the last 13 years to providing comprehensive and accurate data to our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again and collectively save millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback