Gigabyte GA-AX370-Gaming K7

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 61%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 96%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 69%
Battle cruiser
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (64th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 36 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 97.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics60.1% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive74.4% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
23 months ago, 23 months ago.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-AX370-Gaming K7  (all builds)
Memory19.9 GB free of 24 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20220428
Uptime1.3 Days
Run DateMay 26 '22 at 07:51
Run Duration258 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU0%
Watch Gameplay: 1060-6GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (64th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 9 5900X-$245
AM4, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.45 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (49th percentile)
97.8% Outstanding
Memory 71.9
1-Core 176
2-Core 344
103% 197 Pts
4-Core 660
8-Core 1,219
112% 940 Pts
64-Core 2130
132% 2130 Pts
Poor: 87%
This bench: 97.8%
Great: 108%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117
EVGA(3842 6268) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2025 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 512.15
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
60.1% Good
Lighting 76.7
Reflection 76.8
Parallax 74.3
62% 75.9 fps
MRender 65
Gravity 70.7
Splatting 66.9
55% 67.5 fps
Poor: 51%
This bench: 60.1%
Great: 60%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Spcc Solid State Disk 512GB
275GB free (System drive)
Firmware: S0628A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 11 329 175 34 38 82 MB/s
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
74.4% Very good
Read 493
Write 380
Mixed 368
SusWrite 111
75% 338 MB/s
4K Read 24.1
4K Write 113
4K Mixed 24.9
128% 54.1 MB/s
DQ Read 113
DQ Write 330
DQ Mixed 0.8
64% 148 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 74.4%
Great: 102%
WDC WD140EDGZ-11B1PA0 14TB
10TB free
Firmware: 85.00A85
SusWrite @10s intervals: 188 193 192 198 191 197 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
Read 212
Write 210
Mixed 141
SusWrite 193
42% 189 MB/s
DQ Read 7.5
DQ Write 5.9
DQ Mixed 2.2
3% 5.2 MB/s
4K Read 6
4K Write 9
21% 7.5 MB/s
Poor: 17% Great: 25%
WD WD100EZAZ-11TDBA0 10TB
2.5TB free
Firmware: 83.H0A83
SusWrite @10s intervals: 104 102 103 104 106 98 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 58% Great: 115%
WD WD80EMAZ-00WJTA0 8TB
2.5TB free
Firmware: 83.H0A83
SusWrite @10s intervals: 173 176 175 178 181 173 MB/s
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
93.9% Outstanding
Read 150
Write 157
Mixed 91
SusWrite 176
105% 143 MB/s
4K Read 2
4K Write 4.8
4K Mixed 1.1
294% 2.63 MB/s
Poor: 53%
This bench: 93.9%
Great: 105%
WD WD80EMAZ-00WJTA0 8TB
83GB free
Firmware: 83.H0A83
SusWrite @10s intervals: 165 164 167 167 167 166 MB/s
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
90% Outstanding
Read 146
Write 139
Mixed 93.3
SusWrite 166
100% 136 MB/s
4K Read 2.2
4K Write 5.1
4K Mixed 1
297% 2.77 MB/s
Poor: 53%
This bench: 90%
Great: 105%
WD WD80EMAZ-00WJTA0 8TB
72GB free
Firmware: 83.H0A83
SusWrite @10s intervals: 129 134 129 133 131 130 MB/s
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
78.8% Very good
Read 142
Write 149
Mixed 95.4
SusWrite 131
95% 129 MB/s
4K Read 2.5
4K Write 4.9
4K Mixed 1.1
317% 2.83 MB/s
Poor: 53%
This bench: 78.8%
Great: 105%
WD WD120EMAZ-11BLFA0 12TB
497GB free
Firmware: 81.00A81
SusWrite @10s intervals: 122 126 127 124 129 125 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 54% Great: 114%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CMK16GX4M2B3200C16 CMK16GX4M2B3200C16 F4-2800C16-8GVG 24GB
2133, 2133, 2133 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
65.6% Good
MC Read 33
MC Write 19.3
MC Mixed 19.9
69% 24.1 GB/s
SC Read 17.2
SC Write 15.9
SC Mixed 18.9
50% 17.3 GB/s
Latency 96.9
41% 96.9 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-AX370-Gaming K7 Builds (Compare 526 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 79%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 77%
Battleship

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-AX370-Gaming K7 - $229

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 98% - Outstanding Total price: $651
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $289Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $168Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback