ADD TO PC
BUILD

Asus G750JS

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing CPU, RAM
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (59th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 41 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Graphics	24.4% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	76.2% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 8.1 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen.

System	Asus G750JS (all builds)
Motherboard	ASUSTeK G750JS
Memory	12 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OS	Windows 8.1
BIOS Date	20140219
Uptime	1.1 Days
Run Date	Nov 29 '15 at 08:22
Run Duration	119 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	4%

PC Performing as expected (59^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-4700HQ-$370 42,062 User benchmarks, average bench 62% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg) Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete		1-Core 96.1 2-Core 188 65% 142 Pts	4-Core 325 8-Core 504 51% 415 Pts	64-Core 505 31% 505 Pts
Poor: 40% Great: 74%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 870M 3,247 User benchmarks, average bench 22% Asus(1043 157D) 3GB Driver: nvd3dumx.dll Ver. 10.18.13.5900 Performing way above expectations (92^nd percentile)	24.4% Poor	Lighting 30.9 Reflection 29.2 Parallax 35.2 25% 31.7 fps	MRender 31.7 Gravity 28.8 Splatting 25 23% 28.5 fps
Poor: 17% ↑ This bench: 24.4% Great: 24%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
SanDisk X110 256GB-$100 4,989 User benchmarks, average bench 79% 95GB free (System drive) Firmware: X231600 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below expectations (40^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 253 100 7932 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 863 (A6) Unknown 100 100 1 (A7) Unknown 100 100 20 (A8) Unknown 100 100 152 (A9) Unknown 100 100 254 (AB) Unknown 100 100 0 (AC) Unknown 100 100 0 (AD) Unknown 100 100 45 (AE) Unknown 100 100 14 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (C2) HDA temperature 59 62 266288693289 (D4) Unknown 100 100 0 (E6) GMR head amplitude 100 100 306 (E8) Unknown 100 100 100 (E9) Unknown 100 100 11910 (F1) Unknown 253 253 4648 (F2) Unknown 253 253 3734 (F3) Unknown 100 100 0	76.2% Very good	Read 408 Write 306 Mixed 345 78% 353 MB/s	4K Read 27 4K Write 66.6 4K Mixed 21.6 104% 38.4 MB/s	DQ Read 256 DQ Write 207 DQ Mixed 48.7 86% 171 MB/s
Poor: 55% ↑ This bench: 76.2% Great: 100%
HGST Travelstar 7K1000 2.5" 1TB 546,982 User benchmarks, average bench 59% 384GB free Firmware: JB0OA3J0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing as expected (46^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (02) Throughput performance 100 100 0 (03) Spinup time 129 129 98784247810 (04) Start/Stop count 99 99 2399 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 100 0 (08) Seek timer performance 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 82 82 8002 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 859 (BF) G-sense error rate 100 100 0 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 8 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 83 83 179175 (C2) HDA temperature 181 181 193273790497 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 1 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (DF) Load/unload retry count 100 100 0	59% Above average	Read 102 Write 104 Mixed 103 78% 103 MB/s	4K Read 0.67 4K Write 1.43 4K Mixed 0.19 75% 0.76 MB/s
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 59% Great: 75%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Typical G750JS Builds (Compare 326 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming

Gaming 7%

Tree trunk

Desktop

Desktop 58%

Gunboat

Workstation

Workstation 7%

Tree trunk

System: Asus G750JS

CPU
Core i7-4700HQIntel $370Bench 62%, 42,062 samples	210x
Core i7-4710HQIntelBench 58%, 69,536 samples	115x
Core i7-4712HQIntelBench 61%, 5,396 samples	1x

GPU
HD 4600 (Mobile 1.15 GHz)IntelBench 3%, 258,091 samples	208x
GTX 870MNvidiaBench 22%, 3,247 samples	118x

SSD
mSATA SD5SE2256G1002E 256GBSanDiskBench 71%, 860 samples	26x
X110 256GBSanDisk $100Bench 79%, 4,989 samples	16x
RBU-SC100S37128GD 128GBKingstonBench 58%, 1,846 samples	9x

RAM
M471B1G73QH0-YK0 2x8GBSamsungBench 52%, 22,647 samples	79x
HMT41GS6AFR8A-PB 2x8GBHynixBench 51%, 18,309 samples	26x
M471B5173QH0-YK0 2x4GBSamsungBench 48%, 30,873 samples	16x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 57% - Above average

Total price: $370

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?

Marketers operate a lot of reddit accounts. UserBenchmark exposes their spiel so they attack our reputation.

Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?

PC brands make a lot on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.

Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?

We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.

Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?

The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.

Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?

Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data which saves our users millions.

The Best.

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4070 $549	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission

Today's hottest

Amazon Ebay

deals

CPU GPU SSD HDD USB RAM MBD

Build

Test

EFps

Can You Run It?

►
YouTube
*NEW*

About • User Guide • FAQs • Email • Privacy • Developer • YouTube Feedback