Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (71st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 29 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 73.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	43.5% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Windows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.

2 years ago, 23 months ago.

PC Performing above expectations (71^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-9300H 116,682 User benchmarks, average bench 65% U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 3.25 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (72^nd percentile)	73.1% Very good	Memory 90.4 1-Core 117 2-Core 198 79% 135 Pts	4-Core 305 8-Core 424 46% 364 Pts	64-Core 464 29% 464 Pts
Poor: 38% ↑ This bench: 73.1% Great: 81%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1650 (Mobile) 92,838 User benchmarks, average bench 41% Acer(1025 1332) ≥ 4GB Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 30.0.15.1295 Performing below potential (67^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	43.5% Average	Lighting 56.3 Reflection 59.5 Parallax 52.4 46% 56.1 fps	MRender 41.6 Gravity 50.8 Splatting 48.8 39% 47.1 fps
Poor: 28% ↑ This bench: 43.5% Great: 46%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Micron_2200_MTFDHBA512TCK 512GB 4,220 User benchmarks, average bench 188% 114GB free (System drive) Firmware: P1MA003 Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 1,478 Write 1,408 Mixed 1,144 299% 1,343 MB/s	4K Read 41.6 4K Write 78.7 4K Mixed 43.7 161% 54.7 MB/s	DQ Read 888 DQ Write 667 DQ Mixed 770 578% 775 MB/s
Poor: 122% Great: 239%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston ACR26D4S9S8HJ-8 1x8GB 4,751 User benchmarks, average bench 42% 1 of 2 slots used 8GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz Performing above expectations (75^th percentile)	44.5% Average	MC Read 17 MC Write 16.1 MC Mixed 12 43% 15 GB/s	SC Read 9.1 SC Write 16.4 SC Mixed 12.8 36% 12.8 GB/s	Latency 66.7 60% 66.7 ns
Poor: 32% ↑ This bench: 44.5% Great: 46%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 12%

Tree trunk

Desktop 65%

Battle cruiser

Workstation 11%

Tree trunk

GPU
UHD Graphics 630IntelBench 5%, 506,702 samples	6,006x
GTX 1650 (Mobile)NvidiaBench 41%, 92,838 samples	3,476x
RTX 2060 (Mobile)NvidiaBench 71%, 119,687 samples	938x

SSD
HFM256GDJTNG-8310A 256GBBench 121%, 26,870 samples	1,217x
Micron_2200_MTFDHBA512TCK 512GBBench 188%, 4,220 samples	1,035x
RBUSNS8154P3512GJ1 512GBKingstonBench 126%, 5,630 samples	746x

RAM
ACR26D4S9S8HJ-8 2x8GBKingstonBench 75%, 2,420 samples	848x
ACR26D4S9S8HJ-8 1x8GBKingstonBench 42%, 4,751 samples	758x
HMA81GS6JJR8N-VK 1x8GBHynixBench 40%, 48,644 samples	733x

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16