Performance Results


Gaming 74% Battleship	Desktop 99% Nuclear submarine	Workstation 68% Battle cruiser


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (63rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 37 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 98.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics	70.1% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	178% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

PC Performing above expectations (63^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-9700F-$279 54,980 User benchmarks, average bench 92% LGA1151, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 4.2 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (94^th percentile)	98.6% Outstanding	Memory 93 1-Core 143 2-Core 265 93% 167 Pts	4-Core 559 8-Core 944 91% 752 Pts	64-Core 966 60% 966 Pts
Poor: 74% ↑ This bench: 98.6% Great: 100%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2060S (Super)-$510 319,148 User benchmarks, average bench 100% Gigabyte(1458 3FF1) CLim: 2145 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 512.77 Relative performance (0^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	70.1% Very good	Lighting 87.2 Reflection 84 Parallax 85 71% 85.4 fps	MRender 109 Gravity 73.6 Splatting 73.6 68% 85.3 fps
Poor: 90% ↑ This bench: 70.1% Great: 106%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung MZVLB512HAJQ-000H2 512GB 2,013 User benchmarks, average bench 240% 199GB free (System drive) Firmware: EXA71HAQ SusWrite @10s intervals: 351 554 534 611 589 576 MB/s Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)	178% Outstanding	Read 672 Write 614 Mixed 622 SusWrite 536 138% 611 MB/s	4K Read 62.6 4K Write 130 4K Mixed 80.9 267% 91.2 MB/s	DQ Read 842 DQ Write 729 DQ Mixed 1,147 761% 906 MB/s
Poor: 178% ↑ This bench: 178% Great: 284%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Micron 8ATF1G64AZ-2G6E1 2x8GB 6,317 User benchmarks, average bench 78% 2 of 2 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2666 MHz Performing way above expectations (90^th percentile)	88.8% Excellent	MC Read 34.3 MC Write 35.2 MC Mixed 24.6 90% 31.4 GB/s	SC Read 19.9 SC Write 37 SC Mixed 26.7 80% 27.9 GB/s	Latency 62.2 64% 62.2 ns
Poor: 54% ↑ This bench: 88.8% Great: 92%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 37%

Jet ski

Desktop 87%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 29%

Raft

GPU
GTX 1650Nvidia $155Bench 43%, 259,091 samples	280x
GTX 1660S (Super)Nvidia $195Bench 71%, 428,800 samples	13x
RTX 2060Nvidia $271Bench 90%, 645,160 samples	11x

SSD
PCS PCIe M.2 SSD 256GB256gbBench 143%, 1,971 samples	255x
SU630 240GBAdataBench 64%, 60,212 samples	14x
870 EVO 1TBSamsung $100Bench 112%, 129,044 samples	5x

RAM
CM4X8GF2400Z16K4 1x8GBCorsairBench 41%, 959 samples	118x
CMK8GX4M1A2400C16 CM4X8GF2400Z16K4 16GBCorsairBench 73%, 164 samples	52x
CM4X8GF2400Z16K4 CMK8GX4M1A2400C16 16GBCorsairBench 76%, 257 samples	40x

Value: 81% - Excellent

Total price: $270