Advantech POC-S198

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 44%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (13th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 87 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 46.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics1.78% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive55.7% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (38%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemAdvantech POC-S198  (all builds)
MotherboardINTEL ChiefRiver
Memory4.4 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130327
Uptime5.2 Days
Run DateMay 25 '22 at 14:59
Run Duration235 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU 38%

 PC Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-3555LE
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 1.45 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (20th percentile)
46.2% Average
Memory 76.2
1-Core 41.8
2-Core 59.5
42% 59.2 Pts
4-Core 96.4
8-Core 102
13% 99.2 Pts
64-Core 99.5
6% 99.5 Pts
Poor: 24%
This bench: 46.2%
Great: 61%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 4000 (Mobile 1.25 GHz)
Intel(8086 2010) 2GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.10.4358
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
1.78% Terrible
Lighting 2.2
Reflection 2.6
Parallax 1.8
2% 2.2 fps
MRender 1.9
Gravity 1.4
Splatting 2.8
2% 2.03 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 1.78%
Great: 4%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial MX500 250GB-$39
185GB free (System drive)
Firmware: M3CR043
SusWrite @10s intervals: 234 159 144 159 170 216 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
55.7% Above average
Read 338
Write 256
Mixed 365
SusWrite 180
64% 285 MB/s
4K Read 22.3
4K Write 33.4
4K Mixed 27.5
87% 27.7 MB/s
DQ Read 105
DQ Write 70.6
DQ Mixed 94.7
69% 90 MB/s
Poor: 73%
This bench: 55.7%
Great: 123%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 99U5469-056.A00LF 2x4GB
2 of 4 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)
39.7% Below average
MC Read 12.3
MC Write 15.7
MC Mixed 14.7
41% 14.2 GB/s
SC Read 8.8
SC Write 9.4
SC Mixed 8.5
25% 8.9 GB/s
Latency 88
46% 88 ns
Poor: 19%
This bench: 39.7%
Great: 54%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical POC-S198 Builds (Compare 1 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 52%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

System: Advantech POC-S198

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 26% - Poor Total price: $39
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $48
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback