HP EliteBook 8770w

Performance Results


Gaming 8% Tree trunk	Desktop 57% Gunboat	Workstation 6% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (61st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 39 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 55.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	7.63% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	64.6% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

23 months ago, 23 months ago, 23 months ago, 23 months ago, 23 months ago, 23 months ago, 23 months ago, 23 months ago, 23 months ago, 23 months ago, 23 months ago, 23 months ago, 23 months ago, 23 months ago, 23 months ago, 23 months ago, 23 months ago, 23 months ago, 23 months ago, 23 months ago, 23 months ago, 23 months ago, 23 months ago, 23 months ago, 23 months ago, 23 months ago, 23 months ago, 23 months ago. (Only the first run influences device rankings)

System	HP EliteBook 8770w (all builds)
Motherboard	Hewlett-Packard 176C
Memory	4.9 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20130520
Uptime	0.4 Days
Run Date	May 25 '22 at 00:55
Run Duration	141 Seconds
Run User	IDN-User
Background CPU	3%

PC Performing above expectations (61^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-3820QM-$275 3,135 User benchmarks, average bench 66% U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.7 GHz, turbo 2.7 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (10^th percentile)	55.6% Above average	Memory 79.9 1-Core 71.5 2-Core 113 56% 88.1 Pts	4-Core 184 8-Core 183 24% 183 Pts	64-Core 184 11% 184 Pts
Poor: 44% ↑ This bench: 55.6% Great: 75%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia Quadro K3000M 2,310 User benchmarks, average bench 8% HP(103C 176C) 2GB CLim: 653 MHz, MLim: 700 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 385.73 Performing above expectations (77^th percentile)	7.63% Terrible	Lighting 8.3 Reflection 11.3 Parallax 11.2 7% 10.3 fps	MRender 12.7 Gravity 11.3 Splatting 10.5 9% 11.5 fps
Poor: 6% ↑ This bench: 7.63% Great: 8%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
RX7 2.5 256GB 200 User benchmarks, average bench 61% 163GB free (System drive) Firmware: 2201XKR SusWrite @10s intervals: 412 347 190 102 101 369 MB/s Performing above expectations (60^th percentile)	64.6% Good	Read 385 Write 416 Mixed 337 SusWrite 254 78% 348 MB/s	4K Read 20.8 4K Write 40.4 4K Mixed 24.3 84% 28.5 MB/s	DQ Read 78.7 DQ Write 265 DQ Mixed 126 110% 157 MB/s
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 64.6% Great: 84%
Seagate ST500VT000-1DK142 500GB 8,025 User benchmarks, average bench 46% 347GB free Firmware: 0001SDC1 SusWrite @10s intervals: 105 104 106 108 108 108 MB/s Performing way above expectations (97^th percentile)	63.7% Good	Read 116 Write 113 Mixed 53.8 SusWrite 106 71% 97.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 0.7 4K Mixed 0.7 112% 0.63 MB/s
Poor: 16% ↑ This bench: 63.7% Great: 63%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Hynix 1x8GB 907 User benchmarks, average bench 32% 1 of 4 slots used 8GB SODIMM DDR3 1600 MHz Performing above expectations (63^rd percentile)	31.7% Below average	MC Read 10.8 MC Write 9.8 MC Mixed 9.6 29% 10.1 GB/s	SC Read 10.8 SC Write 11.9 SC Mixed 10.8 32% 11.2 GB/s	Latency 80.7 50% 80.7 ns
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 31.7% Great: 47%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical EliteBook 8770w Builds (Compare 564 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 10%

Tree trunk

Desktop 62%

Destroyer

Workstation 9%

Tree trunk

System: HP EliteBook 8770w

CPU
Core i7-3720QMIntel $100Bench 65%, 9,911 samples	99x
Core i7-3630QMIntel $420Bench 61%, 65,927 samples	92x
Core i7-3740QMIntel $220Bench 64%, 14,369 samples	82x

GPU
Quadro K3000MNvidiaBench 8%, 2,310 samples	296x
Quadro K4000MNvidiaBench 12%, 631 samples	95x
Radeon HD 7700MAMDBench 7%, 733 samples	25x

SSD
C400 RealSSD 256GBMicronBench 55%, 11,652 samples	34x
860 Evo 250GBSamsung $52Bench 104%, 296,814 samples	14x
MZ7PD256HCGM-000H7 256GBSamsungBench 84%, 5,922 samples	13x

RAM
8KTF51264HZ-1G6E1 2x4GBMicronBench 48%, 14,177 samples	20x
EBJ81UG8BBU0-GN-F 2x8GBElpidaBench 51%, 682 samples	11x
HMT41GS6MFR8C-PB 4x8GBHynixBench 53%, 361 samples	11x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 86% - Excellent

Total price: $100

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16