Performance Results


Gaming 3% Tree trunk	Desktop 39% Jet ski	Workstation 3% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (54th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 46 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 40.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics	0.27% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	37.6% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

PC Performing as expected (54^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Pentium T4500 8,800 User benchmarks, average bench 34% CPU, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 2.3 GHz Performing way above expectations (90^th percentile)	40.3% Average	Memory 69 1-Core 36.1 2-Core 71.2 39% 58.8 Pts	4-Core 70.6 8-Core 71.3 9% 70.9 Pts	64-Core 70.9 4% 70.9 Pts
Poor: 19% ↑ This bench: 40.3% Great: 41%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel Mobile Series 4 Express Chipset Family 23,924 User benchmarks, average bench 0% HP(103C 1484) 3.8GB Driver: igdumd64.dll Ver. 8.15.10.2302 Performing as expected (50^th percentile)	0.27% Terrible	Lighting 0.4 Reflection 0.5 Parallax 0.4 0% 0.43 fps	MRender 0.5 Gravity 0.1 Splatting 0.1 0% 0.23 fps
Poor: 0% ↑ This bench: 0.27% Great: 1%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
SanDisk Ultra II 960GB-$100 35,454 User benchmarks, average bench 85% 115GB free (System drive) Firmware: X412 SusWrite @10s intervals: 158 119 103 116 73 99 MB/s Relative performance (0^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	37.6% Below average	Read 234 Write 166 Mixed 161 SusWrite 111 38% 168 MB/s	4K Read 15.3 4K Write 28 4K Mixed 14.5 57% 19.3 MB/s	DQ Read 138 DQ Write 51.2 DQ Mixed 11.5 30% 66.9 MB/s
Poor: 62% ↑ This bench: 37.6% Great: 107%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Patriot PSD24G8002S 2x4GB 9 User benchmarks, average bench 18% 2 of 2 slots used 8GB SODIMM DDR2 800 MHz Performing below potential (22^nd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	14.9% Very poor	MC Read 5.5 MC Write 3.9 MC Mixed 4 13% 4.47 GB/s	SC Read 3.8 SC Write 3.8 SC Mixed 4.4 12% 4 GB/s	Latency 104 39% 104 ns
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 14.9% Great: 25%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 2%

Tree trunk

Desktop 38%

Jet ski

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

GPU
HD Graphics (Arrandale 0.667/0.766 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 99,513 samples	109x
Mobility Radeon HD 5470ATIBench 1%, 14,621 samples	36x
Mobility Radeon HD 4250ATIBench 1%, 11,054 samples	26x

RAM
HP594908-HR1-ELD 2x2GBKingstonBench 24%, 207 samples	13x
M471B5773CHS-CH9 2x2GBSamsungBench 29%, 8,570 samples	9x
HMT125S6BFR8C-H9 2x2GBHynixBench 27%, 878 samples	9x

Value: 32% - Below average

Total price: $38