Acer AcerPower Series

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (48th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 52 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 25.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Boot Drive	50.4% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Windows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.

System	Acer AcerPower Series (all builds)
Motherboard	Acer EQ35M
Memory	1.6 GB free of 4 GB @ 0.7 GHz
Display	1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 11
BIOS Date	20090410
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	May 24 '22 at 16:39
Run Duration	190 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	8%

PC Performing as expected (48^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core2 Duo E8400-$89 68,540 User benchmarks, average bench 40% CPU 1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 2.8 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile)	25.6% Poor	Memory 36.3 1-Core 43.1 2-Core 91.1 32% 56.8 Pts	4-Core 87.4 8-Core 89.9 12% 88.7 Pts	64-Core 88.4 6% 88.4 Pts
Poor: 24% ↑ This bench: 25.6% Great: 47%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
SSD 128GB 3,975 User benchmarks, average bench 64% 70GB free (System drive) Firmware: U1124A0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 148 144 104 118 96 105 MB/s Performing below potential (23^rd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	50.4% Above average	Read 245 Write 219 Mixed 232 SusWrite 119 46% 204 MB/s	4K Read 26 4K Write 50.1 4K Mixed 19.7 91% 31.9 MB/s	DQ Read 91.5 DQ Write 182 DQ Mixed 33.2 55% 102 MB/s
Poor: 39% ↑ This bench: 50.4% Great: 85%
Seagate ST3250312AS 250GB-$43 19,180 User benchmarks, average bench 49% 64GB free Firmware: JC4B SusWrite @10s intervals: 77 90 90 90 90 90 MB/s Performing below expectations (35^th percentile)	45.5% Average	Read 70.5 Write 80.1 Mixed 53.1 SusWrite 87.7 54% 72.9 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.9 4K Mixed 0.9 164% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 45.5% Great: 69%
Seagate Momentus 2.5" 1TB 266,123 User benchmarks, average bench 42% 572GB free Firmware: 2BA30001 SusWrite @10s intervals: 84 94 93 94 94 95 MB/s Performing above expectations (75^th percentile)	50.8% Above average	Read 84.4 Write 63.4 Mixed 56 SusWrite 92.4 55% 74.1 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 2.3 4K Mixed 0.6 130% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 50.8% Great: 59%
Samsung HD160JJ/P 160GB-$40 2,028 User benchmarks, average bench 26% 149GB free Firmware: ZM100-51 SusWrite @10s intervals: 58 63 62 63 62 62 MB/s Performing above expectations (78^th percentile)	30.5% Below average	Read 44 Write 64 Mixed 42.4 SusWrite 61.8 39% 53 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.7 4K Mixed 1 163% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 30.5% Great: 34%
MDT MD1600JS-00NCB1 160GB 20 User benchmarks, average bench 30% 105GB free Firmware: 10.02E02 SusWrite @10s intervals: 50 56 56 55 56 56 MB/s Performing as expected (47^th percentile)	30.6% Below average	Read 51.3 Write 56.1 Mixed 44.2 SusWrite 54.9 38% 51.6 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 2 4K Mixed 1 173% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 18% ↑ This bench: 30.6% Great: 35%
Seagate ST3160023AS 160GB-$24 4,798 User benchmarks, average bench 25% 94GB free Firmware: 3.42 SusWrite @10s intervals: 48 51 51 51 51 51 MB/s Performing above expectations (68^th percentile)	28.1% Poor	Read 47.4 Write 47.9 Mixed 36.3 SusWrite 50.4 34% 45.5 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.1 4K Mixed 0.8 138% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 28.1% Great: 32%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 4x1GB 54,972 User benchmarks, average bench 18% 4 of 4 slots used 4GB DIMM DDR2 Performing as expected (49^th percentile)	15.8% Very poor	MC Read 5.6 MC Write 6 MC Mixed 4.2 15% 5.27 GB/s	SC Read 4.9 SC Write 6.5 SC Mixed 4.9 16% 5.43 GB/s	Latency 220 18% 220 ns
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 15.8% Great: 28%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical AcerPower Series Builds (Compare 3 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 0%

Incomplete

Desktop 0%

Incomplete

Workstation 0%

Incomplete

System: Acer AcerPower Series

CPU
Core2 Duo E6550Intel $20Bench 37%, 11,349 samples	1x
Core2 Duo E7400Intel $130Bench 38%, 14,354 samples	1x
Core2 Quad Q9500IntelBench 48%, 5,111 samples	1x

GPU
GeForce GT 710NvidiaBench 3%, 187,161 samples	2x
GeForce 210NvidiaBench 1%, 98,254 samples	1x

RAM
2x2GBUnknownBench 20%, 446,702 samples	2x
2x1GBUnknownBench 14%, 68,489 samples	1x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 77% - Very good

Total price: $20

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $128	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $165	Nvidia RTX 4070 $542	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $29

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

Acer AcerPower Series

Performance Results

PC Performing as expected (48th percentile)

System Memory Latency Ladder

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

System: Acer AcerPower Series

Feedback

PC Performing as expected (48^th percentile)