Avell G1555 MUV / A62 MUV

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 66%
Battle cruiser
Desktop
Desktop 92%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 60%
Gunboat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (76th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 24 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 92.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics66.7% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive67.3% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemAvell G1555 MUV / A62 MUV  (all builds)
MotherboardAvell Avell G1555 MUV / A62 MUV
Memory12.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit cores,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190505
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 24 '22 at 16:27
Run Duration204 Seconds
Run User BRA-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing above expectations (76th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-9750H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 4.1 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
92.3% Outstanding
Memory 90.4
1-Core 133
2-Core 260
90% 161 Pts
4-Core 507
8-Core 779
80% 643 Pts
64-Core 1,024
63% 1,024 Pts
Poor: 49%
This bench: 92.3%
Great: 87%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1660-Ti (Mobile)
Device(1D05 1065) ≥ 4GB
Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 30.0.15.1215
Performing below potential (61st percentile) - GPU OC Guide
66.7% Good
Lighting 84.1
Reflection 92.8
Parallax 78
68% 85 fps
MRender 90
Gravity 75.8
Splatting 69.6
63% 78.5 fps
Poor: 45%
This bench: 66.7%
Great: 72%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SSM28512GPTCB3B-S114613 512GB
403GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFM61.3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 271 372 103 91 96 94 MB/s
Performing below potential (47th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
67.3% Good
Read 257
Write 69.1
Mixed 183
SusWrite 171
38% 170 MB/s
4K Read 29
4K Write 61
4K Mixed 33.1
119% 41 MB/s
DQ Read 214
DQ Write 234
DQ Mixed 182
148% 210 MB/s
Poor: 37%
This bench: 67.3%
Great: 81%
SanDisk Ultra 123GB
87GB free, PID null
SusWrite @10s intervals: 69 38 31 33 38 34 MB/s
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
36.2% Below average
Read 146
Write 65.3
Mixed 71.9
SusWrite 40.5
96% 81.1 MB/s
4K Read 5
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 1.4
121% 2.67 MB/s
Poor: 9%
This bench: 36.2%
Great: 39%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown GKE800SO102408-2666A 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
82.5% Excellent
MC Read 32
MC Write 32.4
MC Mixed 22.6
83% 29 GB/s
SC Read 19.8
SC Write 34.9
SC Mixed 25.3
76% 26.7 GB/s
Latency 66.7
60% 66.7 ns
Poor: 62%
This bench: 82.5%
Great: 84%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical G1555 MUV / A62 MUV Builds (Compare 53 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 12%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 11%
Tree trunk

System: Avell G1555 MUV / A62 MUV

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate a lot of reddit accounts. UserBenchmark exposes their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data which saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback