Fujitsu CELSIUS H970

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 66%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (56th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 44 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 67.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics5.57% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemFujitsu CELSIUS H970  (all builds)
MotherboardFUJITSU FJNBB57
Memory23.6 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs, 2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20191204
Uptime11 Days
Run DateMay 24 '22 at 09:00
Run Duration151 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU10%

 PC Performing as expected (56th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-7820HQ
Onboard, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
67.2% Good
Memory 72.8
1-Core 108
2-Core 207
72% 129 Pts
4-Core 333
8-Core 497
52% 415 Pts
64-Core 513
32% 513 Pts
Poor: 31%
This bench: 67.2%
Great: 77%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD Graphics 630
Fujitsu(10CF 1964) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 26.20.100.7925
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
5.57% Terrible
Lighting 6.3
Reflection 66.3
Parallax 7.3
5% 26.6 fps
MRender 5.9
Gravity 6.5
Splatting 10.1
6% 7.5 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 5.57%
Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZNTN512HDJH-00007 512GB
10GB free (System drive)
Firmware: MAT2109Q
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 404
Write 396
Mixed 292
81% 364 MB/s
4K Read 36.7
4K Write 74
4K Mixed 46.5
154% 52.4 MB/s
DQ Read 377
DQ Write 339
DQ Mixed 330
255% 349 MB/s
Poor: 62% Great: 109%
WDC WDS500G2B0A-00SM50 500GB
252GB free
Firmware: 401000WD
SusWrite @10s intervals: 350 386 381 388 387 396 MB/s
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
104% Outstanding
Read 452
Write 408
Mixed 230
SusWrite 381
82% 368 MB/s
4K Read 35.3
4K Write 75.6
4K Mixed 44.9
151% 51.9 MB/s
DQ Read 384
DQ Write 316
DQ Mixed 208
194% 302 MB/s
Poor: 68%
This bench: 104%
Great: 111%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A2K43BB1-CRC 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (0th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
39.4% Below average
MC Read 13.9
MC Write 13.8
MC Mixed 11.9
38% 13.2 GB/s
SC Read 12
SC Write 14.5
SC Mixed 14.3
39% 13.6 GB/s
Latency 95.1
42% 95.1 ns
Poor: 66%
This bench: 39.4%
Great: 82%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical CELSIUS H970 Builds (Compare 5 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 31%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 27%
Raft

System: Fujitsu CELSIUS H970

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate a lot of reddit accounts. UserBenchmark exposes their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data which saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback