Performance Results


Gaming 4% Tree trunk	Desktop 42% Speed boat	Workstation 4% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (29th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 71 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 41.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics	3.13% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	33.4% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 4GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Very high background CPU (47%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	HP Compaq 8000 Elite CMT PC (all builds)
Motherboard	Hewlett-Packard 3647h
Memory	2.3 GB free of 4.00391 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20110720
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	May 24 '22 at 03:36
Run Duration	127 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	47%

PC Performing below expectations (29^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Pentium E5500 7,497 User benchmarks, average bench 37% XU1 PROCESSOR, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 2.8 GHz Performing above expectations (83^rd percentile)	41.2% Average	Memory 69.5 1-Core 43 2-Core 62.9 40% 58.5 Pts	4-Core 77.1 8-Core 84.2 11% 80.6 Pts	64-Core 85.7 5% 85.7 Pts
Poor: 24% ↑ This bench: 41.2% Great: 43%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 720 15,510 User benchmarks, average bench 4% Asus(1043 84F2) 2GB CLim: 797 MHz, MLim: 450 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 391.35 Performing way below expectations (16^th percentile)	3.13% Terrible	Lighting 3.8 Reflection 3.6 Parallax 3.8 3% 3.73 fps	MRender 4.1 Gravity 3.3 Splatting 4.2 3% 3.87 fps
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 3.13% Great: 6%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
PNY CS900 250GB SSD 2,686 User benchmarks, average bench 75% 195GB free (System drive) Firmware: CS900613 SusWrite @10s intervals: 78 85 117 133 135 74 MB/s Performing below potential (2^nd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	33.4% Below average	Read 133 Write 96.8 Mixed 144 SusWrite 104 27% 119 MB/s	4K Read 17.9 4K Write 30.9 4K Mixed 16.4 64% 21.7 MB/s	DQ Read 33.6 DQ Write 58.7 DQ Mixed 34.4 29% 42.2 MB/s
Poor: 42% ↑ This bench: 33.4% Great: 105%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown ID:80 CE M378B2873FH0-CH9 ID:80 CE M378B2873FH0-CH9 ID:80 CE M378B2873FH0-CH9 ID:80 CE M378B2873FH0-CH9 40GB 63 User benchmarks, average bench 23% 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 0 MHz 1024, 1024, 1024, 1024, 36864 MB Performing below potential (14^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	15.6% Very poor	MC Read 5.9 MC Write 4 MC Mixed 4.3 14% 4.73 GB/s	SC Read 4.1 SC Write 3.5 SC Mixed 5 12% 4.2 GB/s	Latency 103 39% 103 ns
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 15.6% Great: 32%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 4%

Tree trunk

Desktop 40%

Speed boat

Workstation 4%

Tree trunk

CPU
Core2 Duo E8400Intel $89Bench 40%, 68,540 samples	98x
Core2 Duo E8500Intel $110Bench 42%, 18,841 samples	50x
Core2 Quad Q9550Intel $161Bench 49%, 34,093 samples	29x

GPU
Q45/Q43 Express ChipsetIntelBench 0%, 16,152 samples	70x
GeForce GT 710NvidiaBench 3%, 187,161 samples	30x
GT 1030NvidiaBench 14%, 185,384 samples	21x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	6x
RTOTJ128VGD2EYX 128GBBench 54%, 1,124 samples	5x
870 EVO 500GBSamsung $77Bench 104%, 60,851 samples	5x

RAM
ID:80 CE M378B5673FH0-CH9 ID:80 CE M378B5673FH0-CH9 40GBUnknownBench 25%, 680 samples	7x
ID:80 CE M378B5673EH1-CH9 ID:80 CE M378B5673EH1-CH9 40GBUnknownBench 22%, 367 samples	7x
ID:80 AD HMT125U6TFR8C-H9 ID:80 AD HMT125U6TFR8C-H9 40GBUnknownBench 25%, 540 samples	5x

Value: 47% - Average

Total price: $117

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16