Asus M2NPV-VM

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 1%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 30%
Raft
Workstation
Workstation 1%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (44th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 56 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 34.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics3.45% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (27%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago.
MotherboardAsus M2NPV-VM  (all builds)
Memory5.6 GB free of 8 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit colori
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20100602
Uptime5 Days
Run DateMay 23 '22 at 19:25
Run Duration180 Seconds
Run User ITA-User
Background CPU 27%

 PC Performing as expected (44th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Athlon II X4 605e
Socket AM2 , 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 2.3 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
34.4% Below average
Memory 45.3
1-Core 34.1
2-Core 68.1
31% 49.2 Pts
4-Core 137
8-Core 138
18% 137 Pts
64-Core 136
8% 136 Pts
Poor: 36%
This bench: 34.4%
Great: 50%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia Quadro K600
Nvidia(10DE 094B) 1GB
CLim: 875 MHz, MLim: 445 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 472.98
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
3.45% Terrible
Lighting 3.9
Reflection 5.5
Parallax 3.9
3% 4.43 fps
MRender 5
Gravity 4.9
Splatting 4.7
4% 4.87 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.45%
Great: 4%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Maxtor S TM380811AS 80GB
26GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 3.AA
SusWrite @10s intervals: 18 6 6.8 11 26 37 MB/s
Relative performance (0th percentile)
8.36% Terrible
Read 11.7
Write 17.8
Mixed 15.2
SusWrite 17.3
12% 15.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.2
4K Write 0.5
4K Mixed 0.6
84% 0.43 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 8.36%
Great: 42%
Hitachi HTS545016B9A 160GB
63GB free
Firmware: PBBO
SusWrite @10s intervals: 42 41 42 43 41 42 MB/s
Performing as expected (60th percentile)
24.3% Poor
Read 42.4
Write 38.7
Mixed 24.7
SusWrite 41.9
27% 36.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.6
106% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 24.3%
Great: 34%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 4x2GB
4 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR2
Performing above expectations (60th percentile)
23.2% Poor
MC Read 10
MC Write 5.6
MC Mixed 9.7
24% 8.43 GB/s
SC Read 5.5
SC Write 4.6
SC Mixed 6
15% 5.37 GB/s
Latency 179
22% 179 ns
Poor: 14%
This bench: 23.2%
Great: 45%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical M2NPV-VM Builds (Compare 22 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 42%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus M2NPV-VM

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 45% - Average Total price: $155
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback