Gigabyte GA-H110M-S2PT-CF

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (43rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 57 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 71.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics2.94% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (33%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago.
SystemGigabyte H110M-S2PT
MotherboardGigabyte GA-H110M-S2PT-CF  (all builds)
Memory4.1 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1360 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20161116
Uptime29.8 Days
Run DateMay 23 '22 at 13:52
Run Duration172 Seconds
Run User IRN-User
Background CPU 33%

 PC Performing as expected (43rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-6100-$51
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
71.3% Very good
Memory 91.6
1-Core 99.1
2-Core 187
74% 126 Pts
4-Core 298
8-Core 294
40% 296 Pts
64-Core 306
19% 306 Pts
Poor: 29%
This bench: 71.3%
Great: 68%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 730
Asus(1043 85BA) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 700 MHz, MLim: 275 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 391.35
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
2.94% Terrible
Lighting 3.5
Reflection 4.5
Parallax 1.1
3% 3.03 fps
MRender 4.2
Gravity 4.1
Splatting 3.3
3% 3.87 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 2.94%
Great: 7%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate ST3320613AS 320GB-$30
135GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SD22
SusWrite @10s intervals: 35 36 31 17 23 40 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Write 62.1
Mixed 45
SusWrite 30.4
34% 45.8 MB/s
4K Read 0
4K Write 0.9
4K Mixed 0
17% 0.3 MB/s
Poor: 24% Great: 65%
Hitachi HDS721050CLA362 500GB-$59
287GB free
Firmware: JP2OA39C
SusWrite @10s intervals: 72 73 72 72 74 73 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
Read 114
Write 42
Mixed 57.9
SusWrite 72.6
53% 71.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.3
61% 0.85 MB/s
Poor: 27% Great: 74%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 78.B1GMS.C7W0B 2x4GB
2 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 2400 MHz clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (14th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
69.6% Good
MC Read 25.1
MC Write 27.2
MC Mixed 20.9
70% 24.4 GB/s
SC Read 16.1
SC Write 25.3
SC Mixed 21.7
60% 21 GB/s
Latency 64.8
62% 64.8 ns
Poor: 70%
This bench: 69.6%
Great: 90%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-H110M-S2PT-CF Builds (Compare 172 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 22%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 17%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-H110M-S2PT-CF

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 89% - Excellent Total price: $157
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback