Asus TP410UAR

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 63%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (70th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 30 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 64.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics6.23% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive60.2% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory20GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 20GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Very high background CPU (35%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU. CPU throttled at 88% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago.
SystemAsus TP410UAR  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK TP410UAR
Memory17.4 GB free of 20 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20190419
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 23 '22 at 05:38
Run Duration131 Seconds
Run User COL-User
Background CPU 35%
CPU Throttled 88%

 PC Performing above expectations (70th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-8250U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 1.8 GHz, turbo 2.6 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
64.6% Good
Memory 81.7
1-Core 87.3
2-Core 176
67% 115 Pts
4-Core 261
8-Core 354
39% 308 Pts
64-Core 368
23% 368 Pts
Poor: 26%
This bench: 64.6%
Great: 71%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 620 (Mobile Kaby Lake R)
Asus(1043 1AB0) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 30.0.101.1340
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
6.23% Terrible
Lighting 6.9
Reflection 5
Parallax 6.9
6% 6.27 fps
MRender 6.2
Gravity 6.7
Splatting 12.6
7% 8.5 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 6.23%
Great: 6%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston SSDNow V300 240GB-$35
190GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 603ABBF0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 128 107 130 122 125 140 MB/s
Performing below expectations (37th percentile)
60.2% Good
Read 181
Write 175
Mixed 229
SusWrite 125
40% 178 MB/s
4K Read 25.3
4K Write 79.4
4K Mixed 33.1
123% 45.9 MB/s
DQ Read 153
DQ Write 185
DQ Mixed 170
128% 169 MB/s
Poor: 41%
This bench: 60.2%
Great: 85%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron MA451B Kingston 20GB
2133, 2667 MHz
4096, 16384 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
41.9% Average
MC Read 15
MC Write 14.3
MC Mixed 12.3
40% 13.9 GB/s
SC Read 12.1
SC Write 15.5
SC Mixed 14.9
40% 14.2 GB/s
Latency 77.4
52% 77.4 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TP410UAR Builds (Compare 63 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 53%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

System: Asus TP410UAR

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $252Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback