Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 1% Tree trunk	Desktop 49% Yacht	Workstation 0% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (58th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 42 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 51.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	1.69% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

PC Performing as expected (58^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Celeron G1610-$37 5,236 User benchmarks, average bench 49% Intel(R) Celeron(R) CPU G1610 @ 2.60GHz, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 2.6 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (68^th percentile)	51.6% Above average	Memory 81.5 1-Core 69.1 2-Core 136 58% 95.5 Pts	4-Core 129 8-Core 126 17% 128 Pts	64-Core 134 8% 134 Pts
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 51.6% Great: 57%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 7450 10,238 User benchmarks, average bench 2% XFX(1682 3200) 1GB Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.201.1151.1008 Performing as expected (52^nd percentile)	1.69% Terrible	Lighting 2.1 Reflection 2.5 Parallax 2 2% 2.2 fps	MRender 2 Gravity 2 Splatting 2 2% 2 fps
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 1.69% Great: 2%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
Toshiba DT01ACA050 500GB-$25 163,843 User benchmarks, average bench 75% 248GB free (System drive) Firmware: MS1OA750 SusWrite @10s intervals: 86 91 85 86 87 89 MB/s Performing way below expectations (12^th percentile)	47.4% Average	Read 77.5 Write 88 Mixed 27.5 SusWrite 87.5 51% 70.1 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.6 4K Mixed 0.6 117% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 47.4% Great: 103%
Samsung HN-M750MBB 750GB-$58 1,121 User benchmarks, average bench 37% 243GB free Firmware: 2AR10001 SusWrite @10s intervals: 73 73 73 74 74 75 MB/s Performing above expectations (67^th percentile)	43% Average	Read 76.3 Write 40.5 Mixed 49 SusWrite 73.5 44% 59.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.4 4K Mixed 0.7 124% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 43% Great: 56%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
GKH400SO51208-1333 1x4GB 44 User benchmarks, average bench 25% 1 of 2 slots used 4GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz Performing way above expectations (92^nd percentile)	27.8% Poor	MC Read 9.2 MC Write 9 MC Mixed 8 25% 8.73 GB/s	SC Read 8.7 SC Write 9.3 SC Mixed 8.9 26% 8.97 GB/s	Latency 77.8 51% 77.8 ns
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 27.8% Great: 28%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 2%

Tree trunk

Desktop 58%

Gunboat

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

GPU
HD 2500 (Desktop 1.05 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 146,665 samples	454x
HD 2000 (Desktop 1.1 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 150,891 samples	219x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	147x

Value: 72% - Very good

Total price: $287