Ga-b85m GA-B85M-D3H

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 70%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (62nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 38 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 72.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics15.5% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemGa-b85m GA-B85M-D3H  (all builds)
MotherboardGigabyte B85M-D3H
Memory1.4 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit renk
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140305
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateMay 22 '22 at 11:50
Run Duration150 Seconds
Run User TUR-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-4690-$51
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
72.8% Very good
Memory 76.1
1-Core 103
2-Core 214
73% 131 Pts
4-Core 400
8-Core 411
54% 405 Pts
64-Core 408
25% 408 Pts
Poor: 50%
This bench: 72.8%
Great: 77%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 750-$120
Palit(1569 1381) 1GB
CLim: 1359 MHz, MLim: 1275 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 456.71
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
15.5% Very poor
Lighting 18.9
Reflection 17.4
Parallax 17.6
15% 18 fps
MRender 23.9
Gravity 19.6
Splatting 16
16% 19.8 fps
Poor: 13%
This bench: 15.5%
Great: 16%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate ST33000651NS 3TB
3TB free (System drive)
Firmware: G008
SusWrite @10s intervals: 110 75 129 130 128 121 MB/s
Performing below expectations (26th percentile)
61.6% Good
Read 99.5
Write 112
Mixed 38.2
SusWrite 116
66% 91.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.2
4K Write 0.8
4K Mixed 0.6
90% 0.53 MB/s
Poor: 43%
This bench: 61.6%
Great: 86%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M378B5673EH1-CH9 2x2GB
2 of 4 slots used
4GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
28.1% Poor
MC Read 9.2
MC Write 9.6
MC Mixed 8.4
26% 9.07 GB/s
SC Read 8.2
SC Write 9.4
SC Mixed 9.1
25% 8.9 GB/s
Latency 88.1
45% 88.1 ns
Poor: 14%
This bench: 28.1%
Great: 53%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-B85M-D3H Builds (Compare 3 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 35%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 30%
Raft

System: Ga-b85m GA-B85M-D3H

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 44% - Average Total price: $394
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback