Acer Aspire T3-600

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 70%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 54%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (60th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 40 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 67.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics103% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive84.7% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (43%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemAcer Aspire T3-600  (all builds)
MotherboardAcer Aspire T3-600
Memory1.5 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20121018
Uptime0.3 Days
Run DateMay 22 '22 at 02:08
Run Duration224 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU 43%

 PC Performing above expectations (60th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-3350P-$60
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
67.1% Good
Memory 79.6
1-Core 83.4
2-Core 164
64% 109 Pts
4-Core 317
8-Core 314
42% 315 Pts
64-Core 315
20% 315 Pts
Poor: 53%
This bench: 67.1%
Great: 74%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3060-$266
Zotac(19DA 6617) ≥ 4GB; Zotac 12gb White Edition
CLim: 2190 MHz, MLim: 3750 MHz, Ram: 12GB, Driver: 512.59
Performing way above expectations (85th percentile)
103% Outstanding
Lighting 137
Reflection 120
Parallax 125
112% 127 fps
MRender 141
Gravity 106
Splatting 90.6
90% 113 fps
Poor: 90%
This bench: 103%
Great: 106%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 870 EVO 1TB-$100
214GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SVT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 382 396 325 345 324 339 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
84.7% Excellent
Read 474
Write 436
Mixed 335
SusWrite 352
90% 399 MB/s
4K Read 23.3
4K Write 42.7
4K Mixed 28.6
95% 31.5 MB/s
DQ Read 374
DQ Write 296
DQ Mixed 292
230% 320 MB/s
Poor: 82%
This bench: 84.7%
Great: 137%
WD Blue 2.5" 1TB (2013)-$34
291GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 86 87 88 88 88 86 MB/s
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
55.7% Above average
Read 107
Write 105
Mixed 56.9
SusWrite 87.2
65% 88.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.6
126% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 21%
This bench: 55.7%
Great: 63%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston ACR512X64D3U16C11G 2x4GB
2 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing above expectations (68th percentile)
57.2% Above average
MC Read 21.5
MC Write 21.6
MC Mixed 18.2
58% 20.4 GB/s
SC Read 14.9
SC Write 15.3
SC Mixed 16.7
45% 15.6 GB/s
Latency 81.2
49% 81.2 ns
Poor: 29%
This bench: 57.2%
Great: 60%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Aspire T3-600 Builds (Compare 34 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 59%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Acer Aspire T3-600

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 75% - Very good Total price: $88
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback