Biostar A10N-9630E

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 41%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (28th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 72 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 39.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics6.12% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive30% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardBiostar A10N-9630E  (all builds)
Memory5 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1360 x 768 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20191230
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 21 '22 at 22:25
Run Duration221 Seconds
Run User MEX-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing below expectations (28th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A10-9630P APU (2016 M.BR)
P0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 2.85 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)
39.3% Below average
Memory 51.2
1-Core 62.2
2-Core 88.2
41% 67.2 Pts
4-Core 159
8-Core 160
21% 159 Pts
64-Core 154
10% 154 Pts
Poor: 28%
This bench: 39.3%
Great: 50%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon R5 Graphics
AMD(1002 1CE0) 512MB
Ram: 512MB, Driver: 21.5.2
Performing above expectations (85th percentile)
6.12% Terrible
Lighting 7.2
Reflection 9.3
Parallax 10.2
6% 8.9 fps
MRender 7.7
Gravity 8.1
Splatting 8.3
7% 8.03 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 6.12%
Great: 7%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston SA400M8120G 120GB
41GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFK61E1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 52 53 57 53 37 46 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
30% Below average
Read 317
Write 29.4
Mixed 87.3
SusWrite 49.6
26% 121 MB/s
4K Read 27.1
4K Write 3.2
4K Mixed 6.1
51% 12.1 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 30%
Great: 87%
Hitachi HDS721050CLA362 500GB-$59
159GB free
Firmware: JP2OA39C
SusWrite @10s intervals: 88 72 72 51 72 93 MB/s
Performing below expectations (29th percentile)
48.9% Average
Read 96
Write 96.2
Mixed 55.8
SusWrite 74.4
59% 80.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.8
136% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 48.9%
Great: 74%
VendorCo ProductCode 2TB
2TB free, PID 1234
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 0.6 1.4 2.8 4.4 6.4 5.5 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (20th percentile)
4.38% Terrible
Read 17.3
Write 9.8
Mixed 4.8
SusWrite 3.5
10% 8.85 MB/s
4K Read 2.1
4K Write 0.2
4K Mixed 1.3
59% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 3%
This bench: 4.38%
Great: 11%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 2400 C16 Series 2x4GB
2 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 2400 MHz clocked @ 2132 MHz
Performing below potential (1st percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
29.5% Poor
MC Read 11.7
MC Write 7.4
MC Mixed 12.9
30% 10.7 GB/s
SC Read 7.2
SC Write 5.5
SC Mixed 9.6
21% 7.43 GB/s
Latency 156
26% 156 ns
Poor: 44%
This bench: 29.5%
Great: 91%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical A10N-9630E Builds (Compare 8 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 44%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Biostar A10N-9630E

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback