MSI MPG B550I GAMING EDGE WIFI (MS-7C92)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 126%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 110%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 134%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (57th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 43 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 108%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics113% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive115% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemMicro-Star MS-7C92
MotherboardMSI MPG B550I GAMING EDGE WIFI (MS-7C92)  (all builds)
Memory21.5 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20211221
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateMay 21 '22 at 16:08
Run Duration269 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing as expected (57th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 9 5900X-$260
AM4, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.5 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
108% Outstanding
Memory 89.3
1-Core 177
2-Core 341
108% 202 Pts
4-Core 682
8-Core 1,153
112% 917 Pts
64-Core 2,143
133% 2,143 Pts
Poor: 87%
This bench: 108%
Great: 108%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 6700-XT-$480
PowerColor(148C 2310) ≥ 4GB
Ram: 12GB, Driver: 22.5.1
Performing below potential (7th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
113% Outstanding
Lighting 127
Reflection 134
Parallax 271
103% 177 fps
MRender 215
Gravity 145
Splatting 167
142% 175 fps
Poor: 113%
This bench: 113%
Great: 129%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$76
243GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT04B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 307 289 293 286 294 288 MB/s
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
115% Outstanding
Read 514
Write 492
Mixed 467
SusWrite 293
99% 441 MB/s
4K Read 42.2
4K Write 107
4K Mixed 56.9
194% 68.7 MB/s
DQ Read 388
DQ Write 363
DQ Mixed 372
280% 375 MB/s
Poor: 74%
This bench: 115%
Great: 129%
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$69
272GB free
Firmware: 2B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1388 1167 787 789 790 790 MB/s
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
307% Outstanding
Read 2,687
Write 2,474
Mixed 1,890
SusWrite 952
447% 2,001 MB/s
4K Read 71.1
4K Write 171
4K Mixed 95.3
320% 112 MB/s
DQ Read 1,133
DQ Write 726
DQ Mixed 967
711% 942 MB/s
Poor: 178%
This bench: 307%
Great: 355%
External USB3.0 180GB
75GB free
Firmware: 0204
SusWrite @10s intervals: 143 141 141 141 138 141 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
45.8% Average
Read 366
Write 167
Mixed 198
SusWrite 141
48% 218 MB/s
4K Read 20.8
4K Write 13.7
4K Mixed 15.7
59% 16.7 MB/s
DQ Read 154
DQ Write 51.7
DQ Mixed 69.1
60% 91.6 MB/s
Poor: 46%
This bench: 45.8%
Great: 57%
WD Blue 2.5" 320GB (2010)-$18
213GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 72 72 73 73 73 74 MB/s
Performing above expectations (85th percentile)
42.2% Average
Read 74.7
Write 71.1
Mixed 24.2
SusWrite 72.6
44% 60.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 0.4
4K Mixed 0.3
62% 0.4 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 42.2%
Great: 47%
WD Blue 2TB (2015)-$46
697GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 101 99 101 101 100 101 MB/s
Performing below expectations (26th percentile)
55.4% Above average
Read 92.3
Write 96.6
Mixed 63.3
SusWrite 101
65% 88.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.9
169% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 55.4%
Great: 84%
Seagate Desktop 8TB
6TB free
Firmware: 040B
SusWrite @10s intervals: 175 176 176 179 178 174 MB/s
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
77.7% Very good
Read 92.4
Write 153
Mixed 115
SusWrite 176
99% 134 MB/s
4K Read 5.6
4K Write 4.5
4K Mixed 0.8
406% 3.63 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 77.7%
Great: 93%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair CMH32GX4M2D3600C18 2x16GB
2 of 2 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3600 MHz
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
109% Outstanding
MC Read 48.2
MC Write 39.3
MC Mixed 33
115% 40.2 GB/s
SC Read 28.8
SC Write 26.3
SC Mixed 36.2
87% 30.4 GB/s
Latency 68.1
59% 68.1 ns
Poor: 61%
This bench: 109%
Great: 124%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical MPG B550I GAMING EDGE WIFI (MS-7C92) Builds (Compare 717 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 143%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 103%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 130%
UFO

Motherboard: MSI MPG B550I GAMING EDGE WIFI (MS-7C92)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 87% - Excellent Total price: $790
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing charade so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit a lot from flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they've no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products, which UserBenchmark reveals.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. The 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we've dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data which saves our users millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback