Asrock 760GM-GS3

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 52%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (53rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 47 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 54.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics6.78% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive67.1% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (56%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsrock 760GM-GS3  (all builds)
Memory5.5 GB free of 8 GB @ 0.7 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20110222
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 21 '22 at 07:18
Run Duration144 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 56%

 PC Performing as expected (53rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Phenom II X6 1055T-$175
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 2.9 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
54.1% Above average
Memory 76.9
1-Core 48.5
2-Core 101
48% 75.4 Pts
4-Core 172
8-Core 254
26% 213 Pts
64-Core 255
16% 255 Pts
Poor: 46%
This bench: 54.1%
Great: 61%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 730
EVGA(3842 3732) 2GB
CLim: 901 MHz, MLim: 1252 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 472.98
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
6.78% Terrible
Lighting 8.4
Reflection 8.6
Parallax 9.4
7% 8.8 fps
MRender 10.6
Gravity 7.4
Splatting 7
7% 8.33 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 6.78%
Great: 7%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial MX500 500GB-$53
153GB free (System drive)
Firmware: M3CR043
SusWrite @10s intervals: 203 212 212 218 221 222 MB/s
Performing below potential (2nd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
67.1% Good
Read 218
Write 226
Mixed 218
SusWrite 215
50% 219 MB/s
4K Read 31.7
4K Write 51.8
4K Mixed 38.3
124% 40.6 MB/s
DQ Read 150
DQ Write 133
DQ Mixed 118
95% 134 MB/s
Poor: 78%
This bench: 67.1%
Great: 125%
Seagate Laptop SSHD 2.5" 1TB-$41
469GB free
Firmware: HKR1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 90 91 90 90 90 90 MB/s
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
56.5% Above average
Read 105
Write 92.9
Mixed 60.1
SusWrite 90.3
64% 87.1 MB/s
4K Read 1.4
4K Write 5.1
4K Mixed 1.9
364% 2.8 MB/s
Poor: 19%
This bench: 56.5%
Great: 65%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 8GB
667, 667 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing below potential (36th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
28.7% Poor
MC Read 13.1
MC Write 5.5
MC Mixed 10.7
28% 9.77 GB/s
SC Read 6.4
SC Write 5.3
SC Mixed 8.5
19% 6.73 GB/s
Latency 86.6
46% 86.6 ns
Poor: 20%
This bench: 28.7%
Great: 51%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 760GM-GS3 Builds (Compare 15 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 12%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 58%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asrock 760GM-GS3

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 54% - Above average Total price: $189
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $145
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback