Asus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X515FAC_X515FA

Performance Results


Gaming 12% Tree trunk	Desktop 70% Battleship	Workstation 11% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (77th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 23 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 63.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	5.84% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	175% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

CPU throttled at 80% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.

Run History

24 months ago, 23 months ago, 23 months ago.

System	Asus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X515FAC_X515FA (all builds)
Motherboard	ASUSTeK X515FAC
Memory	3.9 GB free of 8 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit kolorów
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20210708
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	May 21 '22 at 06:18
Run Duration	185 Seconds
Run User	POL-User
Background CPU	9%
CPU Throttled	80%

PC Performing above expectations (77^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i3-10110U 11,481 User benchmarks, average bench 47% U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (97^th percentile)	63.8% Good	Memory 74.7 1-Core 120 2-Core 207 76% 134 Pts	4-Core 309 8-Core 296 41% 302 Pts	64-Core 297 18% 297 Pts
Poor: 18% ↑ This bench: 63.8% Great: 63%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 110,580 User benchmarks, average bench 5% Asus(1043 1D6C) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 30.0.100.9864 Performing way above expectations (93^rd percentile)	5.84% Terrible	Lighting 6 Reflection 4.4 Parallax 6.9 5% 5.77 fps	MRender 8.3 Gravity 5.8 Splatting 12.7 8% 8.93 fps
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 5.84% Great: 6%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston OM8PDP3256B-AB1 256GB 738 User benchmarks, average bench 116% 197GB free (System drive) Firmware: EDFK0SA6 SusWrite @10s intervals: 828 451 319 317 321 328 MB/s Performing way above expectations (91^st percentile)	175% Outstanding	Read 958 Write 1,096 Mixed 916 SusWrite 427 191% 849 MB/s	4K Read 37.4 4K Write 172 4K Mixed 75.1 244% 94.8 MB/s	DQ Read 908 DQ Write 621 DQ Mixed 805 590% 778 MB/s
Poor: 50% ↑ This bench: 175% Great: 193%
USB 3.0 super high speed 1TB 165 User benchmarks, average bench 35% 902GB free, PID 0711 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 37 40 40 38 38 38 MB/s Performing way below expectations (15^th percentile)	14.7% Very poor	Read 36.2 Write 31.9 Mixed 23.5 SusWrite 38.7 44% 32.6 MB/s	4K Read 0.2 4K Write 0.3 4K Mixed 0.5 28% 0.33 MB/s
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 14.7% Great: 72%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M471A5244CB0-CWE M471A5244BB0-CWE 8GB 1,146 User benchmarks, average bench 62% 3200, 3200 MHz 4096, 4096 MB Performing way above expectations (87^th percentile)	72.4% Very good	MC Read 24.6 MC Write 29 MC Mixed 22.4 72% 25.3 GB/s	SC Read 17.1 SC Write 35.9 SC Mixed 22.9 72% 25.3 GB/s	Latency 90.9 44% 90.9 ns
Poor: 39% ↑ This bench: 72.4% Great: 76%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X515FAC_X515FA Builds (Compare 192 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 9%

Tree trunk

Desktop 53%

Yacht

Workstation 8%

Tree trunk

System: Asus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X515FAC_X515FA

CPU
Core i3-10110UIntelBench 47%, 11,481 samples	163x
Core i5-10210UIntelBench 53%, 54,859 samples	29x

GPU
UHD GraphicsIntelBench 5%, 110,580 samples	192x

SSD
OM8PDP3256B-AB1 256GBKingstonBench 116%, 738 samples	92x
Micron_2210_MTFDHBA512QFD 512GBBench 176%, 33,645 samples	24x
PC SN530 SDBPNPZ-256G-1002 256GBWDCBench 134%, 10,140 samples	23x

RAM
M471A5244CB0-CWE M471A5244BB0-CWE 8GBSamsungBench 62%, 1,146 samples	74x
M471A5244CB0-CWE 1x4GBSamsungBench 34%, 6,590 samples	49x
HMAA1GS6CJR6N-VK 1x8GBHynixBench 30%, 25 samples	22x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $128	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $165	Nvidia RTX 4070 $542	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $29

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16