Biostar H310MHP 2.0

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 82%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 70%
Battle cruiser
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (64th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 36 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 82.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics101% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive98.2% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardBiostar H310MHP 2.0  (all builds)
Memory12.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210324
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 20 '22 at 14:33
Run Duration152 Seconds
Run User LBN-User
Background CPU6%

 PC Performing above expectations (64th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-8700-$186
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.55 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
82.1% Excellent
Memory 86.9
1-Core 129
2-Core 247
86% 154 Pts
4-Core 417
8-Core 614
64% 516 Pts
64-Core 688
43% 688 Pts
Poor: 75%
This bench: 82.1%
Great: 94%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3060-$250
CLim: 2130 MHz, MLim: 3750 MHz, Ram: 12GB, Driver: 512.77
Performing below potential (62nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
101% Outstanding
Lighting 132
Reflection 123
Parallax 132
108% 129 fps
MRender 136
Gravity 99.4
Splatting 95.7
89% 110 fps
Poor: 90%
This bench: 101%
Great: 106%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
HP S700 120GB-$30
68GB free (System drive)
Firmware: T0311A1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 356 370 376 376 368 377 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
98.2% Outstanding
Read 506
Write 368
Mixed 384
SusWrite 370
91% 407 MB/s
4K Read 36.7
4K Write 113
4K Mixed 29.9
154% 59.9 MB/s
DQ Read 136
DQ Write 306
DQ Mixed 44.2
84% 162 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 98.2%
Great: 95%
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016)-$37
930GB free
Firmware: CC43
SusWrite @10s intervals: 181 184 181 184 182 182 MB/s
Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
105% Outstanding
Read 185
Write 182
Mixed 80.2
SusWrite 182
115% 157 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.8
154% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 60%
This bench: 105%
Great: 113%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston HyperX 2400 C15 1x16GB
1 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
45% Average
MC Read 15.9
MC Write 15.6
MC Mixed 12.9
42% 14.8 GB/s
SC Read 14.2
SC Write 16.3
SC Mixed 15.9
44% 15.5 GB/s
Latency 70.6
57% 70.6 ns
Poor: 35%
This bench: 45%
Great: 49%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical H310MHP 2.0 Builds (Compare 21 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 50%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 88%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 45%
Yacht

Motherboard: Biostar H310MHP 2.0

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 96% - Outstanding Total price: $341
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback