Microelectronics V002

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 80%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 97%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 90%
Nuclear submarine
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (40th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 60 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 90.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics81.1% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive217% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemMicroelectronics V002  (all builds)
MotherboardASRock X570 Taichi
Memory24.3 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display3440 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190830
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 20 '22 at 14:23
Run Duration340 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing below expectations (40th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 9 3900X-$375
AM4, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
90.6% Outstanding
Memory 78.5
1-Core 139
2-Core 282
90% 167 Pts
4-Core 550
8-Core 1,047
95% 798 Pts
64-Core 2116
131% 2116 Pts
Poor: 80%
This bench: 90.6%
Great: 97%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2080S (Super)-$466
Zotac(19DA 5072) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2130 MHz, MLim: 3875 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 511.79
Relative performance (0th percentile) - Disable monitor sync before benchmarking (99 fps cap detected)
81.1% Excellent
Lighting 99.3
Reflection 99.5
Parallax 99.1
81% 99.3 fps
MRender 99.5
Gravity 98.7
Splatting 99.6
81% 99.3 fps
Poor: 116%
This bench: 81.1%
Great: 139%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Pcie SSD 1TB
255GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EGFM11.0 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1228 888 464 416 394 346 MB/s
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
217% Outstanding
Read 2,079
Write 3,525
Mixed 794
SusWrite 623
394% 1,755 MB/s
4K Read 35.7
4K Write 120
4K Mixed 47.4
178% 67.6 MB/s
DQ Read 1,080
DQ Write 781
DQ Mixed 913
687% 925 MB/s
Poor: 115%
This bench: 217%
Great: 438%
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$148
212GB free
Firmware: 2B2QEXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1554 1271 1267 1054 1071 937 MB/s
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
305% Outstanding
Read 2488
Write 2387
Mixed 1,775
SusWrite 1,192
439% 1,961 MB/s
4K Read 64.1
4K Write 154
4K Mixed 86.4
289% 102 MB/s
DQ Read 1,096
DQ Write 835
DQ Mixed 931
706% 954 MB/s
Poor: 214%
This bench: 305%
Great: 372%
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$76
112GB free
Firmware: EMT03B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 454 454 371 202 156 156 MB/s
Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
99.4% Outstanding
Read 476
Write 446
Mixed 396
SusWrite 299
91% 404 MB/s
4K Read 39.3
4K Write 80.4
4K Mixed 52
169% 57.2 MB/s
DQ Read 223
DQ Write 188
DQ Mixed 203
153% 205 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 99.4%
Great: 134%
Kingston HyperX 3K 240GB-$70
144GB free
Firmware: 521ABBF0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 230 208 213 206 209 206 MB/s
Performing below expectations (40th percentile)
78.7% Very good
Read 366
Write 262
Mixed 302
SusWrite 212
64% 285 MB/s
4K Read 32
4K Write 78
4K Mixed 35.3
135% 48.4 MB/s
DQ Read 245
DQ Write 194
DQ Mixed 213
161% 217 MB/s
Poor: 59%
This bench: 78.7%
Great: 94%
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$76
33GB free
Firmware: RVT04B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 439 288 239 210 175 153 MB/s
Performing below expectations (34th percentile)
97% Outstanding
Read 487
Write 437
Mixed 450
SusWrite 250
91% 406 MB/s
4K Read 39.4
4K Write 84
4K Mixed 51.4
170% 58.3 MB/s
DQ Read 222
DQ Write 188
DQ Mixed 202
152% 204 MB/s
Poor: 74%
This bench: 97%
Great: 129%
Samsung D3 Station 4TB
3TB free, PID 6125
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 35 36 36 37 37 37 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
18.3% Very poor
Read 36.4
Write 24.1
Mixed 28.3
SusWrite 36.3
42% 31.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.8
84% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 18.3%
Great: 68%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown NMUD480E86-3200 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
105% Outstanding
MC Read 43.1
MC Write 36.9
MC Mixed 37.1
112% 39 GB/s
SC Read 24.2
SC Write 23.3
SC Mixed 35.3
79% 27.6 GB/s
Latency 83.4
48% 83.4 ns
Poor: 81%
This bench: 105%
Great: 114%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical V002 Builds (Compare 7 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 118%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 95%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 134%
UFO

System: Microelectronics V002

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 73% - Very good Total price: $841
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing charade so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit a lot from flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they've no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products, which UserBenchmark reveals.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. The 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we've dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data which saves our users millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback