Asus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X415EA_A416EA

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 12%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 75%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (89th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 11 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 65.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics10.5% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive162% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago.
SystemAsus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X415EA_A416EA  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK X415EA
Memory3.7 GB free of 8 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20211104
Uptime0.7 Days
Run DateMay 20 '22 at 07:09
Run Duration210 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-1115G4
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 4.05 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
65.8% Good
Memory 71.3
1-Core 144
2-Core 224
82% 146 Pts
4-Core 349
8-Core 347
47% 348 Pts
64-Core 347
22% 347 Pts
Poor: 37%
This bench: 65.8%
Great: 63%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics
Asus(1043 17D2) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 30.0.100.9929
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
10.5% Very poor
Lighting 11.9
Reflection 8.8
Parallax 14.8
10% 11.8 fps
MRender 12.1
Gravity 17
Splatting 14.6
12% 14.6 fps
Poor: 5%
This bench: 10.5%
Great: 11%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Nvme SAMSUNG MZVLQ256HAJD-00000 256GB
194GB free (System drive)
Firmware: FXV7101Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 655 539 163 176 183 194 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
162% Outstanding
Read 1,323
Write 862
Mixed 922
SusWrite 318
190% 856 MB/s
4K Read 48
4K Write 131
4K Mixed 65.9
226% 81.6 MB/s
DQ Read 480
DQ Write 398
DQ Mixed 577
394% 485 MB/s
Poor: 66%
This bench: 162%
Great: 187%
TOSHIBA MK1059GSM 1TB
145GB free, PID 0c31
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 34 35 33 35 35 35 MB/s
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
17.4% Very poor
Read 33.1
Write 26.9
Mixed 23.9
SusWrite 34.5
40% 29.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.6
77% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 10%
This bench: 17.4%
Great: 19%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A1G44AB0-CWE 1x8GB
1 of 1 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
43.5% Average
MC Read 14.7
MC Write 17.5
MC Mixed 11.5
42% 14.6 GB/s
SC Read 16
SC Write 18.2
SC Mixed 13.9
46% 16 GB/s
Latency 98.3
41% 98.3 ns
Poor: 30%
This bench: 43.5%
Great: 44%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X415EA_A416EA Builds (Compare 58 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

System: Asus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X415EA_A416EA

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback